Telerehabilitation using a 2-D planar arm rehabilitation robot for hemiparetic stroke: a feasibility study of clinic-to-home exergaming therapy

Abstract Background We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a 2D-planar robot for minimally supervised home-based upper-limb therapy for post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods The H-Man, end effector robot, combined with web-based software application for remote tele-monitoring were evaluate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Aguirre-Ollinger, Karen Sui Geok Chua, Poo Lee Ong, Christopher Wee Keong Kuah, Tegan Kate Plunkett, Chwee Yin Ng, Lay Wai Khin, Kim Huat Goh, Wei Binh Chong, Jaclyn Ai Mei Low, Malaika Mushtaq, Tengiz Samkharadze, Simone Kager, Hsiao-Ju Cheng, Asif Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01496-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a 2D-planar robot for minimally supervised home-based upper-limb therapy for post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods The H-Man, end effector robot, combined with web-based software application for remote tele-monitoring were evaluated at homes of participants. Inclusion criteria were: strokes > 28 days, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) > 10-60/66, presence of a carer and absence of medical contraindications. Participants performed self-directed, minimally supervised robotics-assisted therapy (RAT) at home for 30 consecutive days, after 2 therapist-supervised clinic on-boarding sessions. Web-based compliance measures were: accessed sessions of > 20 min/day, training minutes/day and active training hours/30 days. Clinical outcomes at weeks 0, 5 (post-training), 12 and 24 (follow-up) consisted of FMA, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and WHO-Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SSQOL). To estimate immediate economic benefits of the home-based robotic therapy, we performed cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), followed by budget impact analysis (BIA). Results Altogether, all 12 participants completed Home-RAT without adverse events; 9 (75.0%) were males, mean (SD) age, 59.4 years (9.5), median (IQR) stroke duration 38.6 weeks (25.4, 79.6) baseline FMA (0–66) 42.1 ± 13.2, ARAT (0–57) 25.4 ± 19.5, SSQOL (0–245) 185.3 ± 32.8. At week 5 follow-up, mean (SD) accessed days were 26.3 days ± 6.4, active training hours of 35.3 h ± 14.7/30 days, or ~ 6 days/week and 77 training minutes ± 20.9/day were observed. Significant gains were observed from baseline across time; ΔFMA 2.4 at week 5 (FMA 44.5, CI 95% 39.7–49.3, p < 0.05) and ΔFMA 3.7 at week 24 (FMA 45.8, CI 95% 40.5–51, p < 0.05); ΔARAT 2.6 at week 5 (ARAT 28.0, CI 95% 19.3–36.7, p < 0.05), and ΔARAT 4.8 at week 24 (ARAT 30.2, CI 95% 21.2–39.1, p < 0.05). At week 5 follow-up, 91% of participants rated their overall experience as satisfied or very satisfied. Incremental CEA observed savings of -S$144/per cure over 24 weeks, BIA—potentially 12% impact reduction over five years. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, safety, clinical efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a home-based, web-enabled telemonitored carer-supervised robotics-aided therapy. Trial registration: NCT05212181  ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ).
ISSN:1743-0003