Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ?
Taken in an all-encompassing sense (as initiated by Werner, 1926), the notion of affordance allows us to think as a first approximation our perceptual relation to objects and especially to what we make of this relation as subjects. Transferring this psychological concept to the observation of lingui...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Corela |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/8434 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846132184295931904 |
|---|---|
| author | Laurent Fauré |
| author_facet | Laurent Fauré |
| author_sort | Laurent Fauré |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Taken in an all-encompassing sense (as initiated by Werner, 1926), the notion of affordance allows us to think as a first approximation our perceptual relation to objects and especially to what we make of this relation as subjects. Transferring this psychological concept to the observation of linguistic data (Paveau, 2013) seems particularly opportune as it concerns its relation to the significance activity, in the sense of Gibson (1979). However, in addition to the successive re-readings that helped to adjust its application to emergence (Turvey et al., 1981), to cultural conventions (Norman, 1999, 2002), or as a disposition to act (Morgagni, 2011), some approaches related to phenomenology –ethnomethodological and enactivist, in particular– have discussed its operativity (Coulter & Sharrock, 1998, Varela et al., 1993).To examine, under its robustness, the precision of this concept, as one can understand its manifestation in discourse and interaction, we set out the transitional character of its operative value. Then, we observe how it can cross various praxeological categories (action, intentionality, resources, indexicality ...). A case study which implicates using artifacts to visualize and communicate (in a CCTV center) is taken as a support for our investigation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6c94899efdbe4ac08b32c5875a9a73de |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1638-573X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Corela |
| spelling | doaj-art-6c94899efdbe4ac08b32c5875a9a73de2024-12-09T15:08:03ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X2019-09-012810.4000/corela.8434Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ?Laurent FauréTaken in an all-encompassing sense (as initiated by Werner, 1926), the notion of affordance allows us to think as a first approximation our perceptual relation to objects and especially to what we make of this relation as subjects. Transferring this psychological concept to the observation of linguistic data (Paveau, 2013) seems particularly opportune as it concerns its relation to the significance activity, in the sense of Gibson (1979). However, in addition to the successive re-readings that helped to adjust its application to emergence (Turvey et al., 1981), to cultural conventions (Norman, 1999, 2002), or as a disposition to act (Morgagni, 2011), some approaches related to phenomenology –ethnomethodological and enactivist, in particular– have discussed its operativity (Coulter & Sharrock, 1998, Varela et al., 1993).To examine, under its robustness, the precision of this concept, as one can understand its manifestation in discourse and interaction, we set out the transitional character of its operative value. Then, we observe how it can cross various praxeological categories (action, intentionality, resources, indexicality ...). A case study which implicates using artifacts to visualize and communicate (in a CCTV center) is taken as a support for our investigation.https://journals.openedition.org/corela/8434perceptionphenomenologyPraxeologyenactionindexicalitysignificance |
| spellingShingle | Laurent Fauré Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? Corela perception phenomenology Praxeology enaction indexicality significance |
| title | Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? |
| title_full | Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? |
| title_fullStr | Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? |
| title_short | Entre perception et praxis : à quoi la notion d’affordance en discours peut-elle bien pourvoir ? |
| title_sort | entre perception et praxis a quoi la notion d affordance en discours peut elle bien pourvoir |
| topic | perception phenomenology Praxeology enaction indexicality significance |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/8434 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laurentfaure entreperceptionetpraxisaquoilanotiondaffordanceendiscourspeutellebienpourvoir |