Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis

BackgroundStroke is the leading cause of disability globally, with antiplatelet therapy being crucial for secondary prevention but also increasing bleeding risks. This requires careful dosage adjustments to balance thrombosis and bleeding risks.ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy and safety of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao Ren, Chunxing Li, Xin Zhang, Lichaoyue Sun, Hui Zhu, Dongxiao Wang, Yumin Wang, Shuo Liang, Guanchun Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1484130/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558773102018560
author Zhao Ren
Chunxing Li
Xin Zhang
Lichaoyue Sun
Hui Zhu
Dongxiao Wang
Yumin Wang
Shuo Liang
Guanchun Wang
author_facet Zhao Ren
Chunxing Li
Xin Zhang
Lichaoyue Sun
Hui Zhu
Dongxiao Wang
Yumin Wang
Shuo Liang
Guanchun Wang
author_sort Zhao Ren
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundStroke is the leading cause of disability globally, with antiplatelet therapy being crucial for secondary prevention but also increasing bleeding risks. This requires careful dosage adjustments to balance thrombosis and bleeding risks.ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and the Wanfang Medical Database, up to March 2024. Only randomized controlled trials assessing low-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients were considered. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) was used for quality. Performed meta-analysis using Stata 15.0, with relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect estimates.ResultsTen studies involving 7,703 Asia participants, mainly from China and Japan, were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that low-dose reduces the risk of bleeding (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.98) compared to standard dose, with similar risks for stroke (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.69, 1.55), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 1.91; 95% CI 0.88, 4.12), all-cause death (ACD) (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.38, 3.62), and major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.16, 3.30). Subgroup analysis revealed that compared to standard-dose clopidogrel, low-dose clopidogrel increased the risk of MI. Notably, this increased risk was observed specifically within the Chinese population but not in the Japanese population. Low-dose clopidogrel and low-dose prasugrel reduce the risk of bleeding compared to standard-dose clopidogrel, but there is no statistically significant difference. Low-dose aspirin significantly reduces the risk of bleeding compared to standard-dose aspirin.ConclusionIn patients with stroke in Asia, low-dose antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces the risk of bleeding compared to standard doses, with consistent risks of stroke, MI, ACD, major bleeding, and discontinuation due to bleeding.
format Article
id doaj-art-6b18f4953b2642edb2416338929b73f9
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-6b18f4953b2642edb2416338929b73f92025-01-06T05:13:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011510.3389/fphar.2024.14841301484130Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysisZhao Ren0Chunxing Li1Xin Zhang2Lichaoyue Sun3Hui Zhu4Dongxiao Wang5Yumin Wang6Shuo Liang7Guanchun Wang8Department of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Aerospace Central Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, ChinaBackgroundStroke is the leading cause of disability globally, with antiplatelet therapy being crucial for secondary prevention but also increasing bleeding risks. This requires careful dosage adjustments to balance thrombosis and bleeding risks.ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and the Wanfang Medical Database, up to March 2024. Only randomized controlled trials assessing low-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients were considered. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) was used for quality. Performed meta-analysis using Stata 15.0, with relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect estimates.ResultsTen studies involving 7,703 Asia participants, mainly from China and Japan, were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that low-dose reduces the risk of bleeding (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.98) compared to standard dose, with similar risks for stroke (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.69, 1.55), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 1.91; 95% CI 0.88, 4.12), all-cause death (ACD) (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.38, 3.62), and major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.16, 3.30). Subgroup analysis revealed that compared to standard-dose clopidogrel, low-dose clopidogrel increased the risk of MI. Notably, this increased risk was observed specifically within the Chinese population but not in the Japanese population. Low-dose clopidogrel and low-dose prasugrel reduce the risk of bleeding compared to standard-dose clopidogrel, but there is no statistically significant difference. Low-dose aspirin significantly reduces the risk of bleeding compared to standard-dose aspirin.ConclusionIn patients with stroke in Asia, low-dose antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces the risk of bleeding compared to standard doses, with consistent risks of stroke, MI, ACD, major bleeding, and discontinuation due to bleeding.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1484130/fulllow-doseantiplatelet therapystrokemyocardial infarctionbleedingmeta-analysis
spellingShingle Zhao Ren
Chunxing Li
Xin Zhang
Lichaoyue Sun
Hui Zhu
Dongxiao Wang
Yumin Wang
Shuo Liang
Guanchun Wang
Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
Frontiers in Pharmacology
low-dose
antiplatelet therapy
stroke
myocardial infarction
bleeding
meta-analysis
title Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparing efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparing efficacy and safety of low dose versus standard dose antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients a meta analysis
topic low-dose
antiplatelet therapy
stroke
myocardial infarction
bleeding
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1484130/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoren comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT chunxingli comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT xinzhang comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT lichaoyuesun comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT huizhu comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT dongxiaowang comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT yuminwang comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT shuoliang comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis
AT guanchunwang comparingefficacyandsafetyoflowdoseversusstandarddoseantiplatelettherapyinstrokepatientsametaanalysis