Analysis of Difference between the Objective Effect and Subjective Effect in Rehabilitation Treatment of Dysphagia after Stroke
Objective:To analyze the reason of the difference of clinical curative effect after rehabilitation treatment for stroke patients with dysphagia.Methods:A total of thirty stroke patients with dysphagia were evaluated with standardized swallowing assessment (SSA), video fluoroscopic swallowing study (...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Rehabilitation Medicine
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | 康复学报 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://kfxb.publish.founderss.cn/thesisDetails#10.3724/SP.J.1329.2016.05017 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objective:To analyze the reason of the difference of clinical curative effect after rehabilitation treatment for stroke patients with dysphagia.Methods:A total of thirty stroke patients with dysphagia were evaluated with standardized swallowing assessment (SSA), video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and swallowing disorder patient's quality of life scale (SWAL-QOL).Results:After four weeks of rehabilitation treatment, the SSA, VFSS and SWAL-QOL scores were significantly increased (<italic>P</italic><0.01), and the SWAL-QOL score was lower than the SSA or VFSS score, but there was not a significant difference among them.Conclusion:A reason for the differences of SSA, VFSS and SWAL-QOL is the objectivity and subjectivity of curative evaluation. SWAL-QOL score is focus on the subjective effect and lower, suggesting that for patients with dysphagia, the psychological burden of swallowing disorder has a significant impact on the clinical outcome of patients. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2096-0328 |