Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.

<h4>Objective</h4>To analyse the interrater reliability of the NEUMOBACT checklist and verify whether consistent results are reproducible.<h4>Methods</h4>A validation study with a cross-sectional design, compliant with the GRRAS checklist, among ICU nurses attending a SIMULAZ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Raurell-Torredà, Ignacio Zaragoza-García, Oscar Arrogante, Anna María Aliberch-Raurell, Francisco Javier Sánchez-Chillón, Martín Torralba-Melero, Andrés Rojo-Rojo, Alfonso Muriel-García, Ana Carolina Amaya Arias, Juan Roldán-Merino, Mariona Farrés-Tarafa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313175
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555558733185024
author Marta Raurell-Torredà
Ignacio Zaragoza-García
Oscar Arrogante
Anna María Aliberch-Raurell
Francisco Javier Sánchez-Chillón
Martín Torralba-Melero
Andrés Rojo-Rojo
Alfonso Muriel-García
Ana Carolina Amaya Arias
Juan Roldán-Merino
Mariona Farrés-Tarafa
author_facet Marta Raurell-Torredà
Ignacio Zaragoza-García
Oscar Arrogante
Anna María Aliberch-Raurell
Francisco Javier Sánchez-Chillón
Martín Torralba-Melero
Andrés Rojo-Rojo
Alfonso Muriel-García
Ana Carolina Amaya Arias
Juan Roldán-Merino
Mariona Farrés-Tarafa
author_sort Marta Raurell-Torredà
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To analyse the interrater reliability of the NEUMOBACT checklist and verify whether consistent results are reproducible.<h4>Methods</h4>A validation study with a cross-sectional design, compliant with the GRRAS checklist, among ICU nurses attending a SIMULAZERO course with an Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation simulation format, to verify transfer from theory to clinical practice of knowledge and skills in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) prevention. A minimum sample size of 111 pairs of nurse raters was calculated. Interrater agreement was analysed using Gwet's AC1 for each item and as a total for each of the three checklists in the NEUMOBACT instrument.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 95 pairs of valid NEUMOBACT checklists were completed by 190 raters with a median age of 29 [25-35] years, 93.7% were female. At the Central Venous Catheter insertion station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.934 (95% CI [0.919-0.949]). Only 2 of the 17 items scored below 0.9. At the Endotracheal Suctioning station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.869 (95% CI [0.851-0.886]). Of the 26 items that made up this station, 16 had an agreement percentage above 0.9, a further 9 were between 0.821 and 0.884, and item 13 had a value of 0.789. At the Patient Care station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.911 (95% CI [0.896-0.927]). Of the 21 items, 17 showed an agreement percentage above 0.9 and 4 were between 0.810 and 0.894.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The interrater reliability of the NEUMOBACT checklist shows substantial agreement between pairs of raters and is therefore validated in this large sample of ICU nurses.<h4>Relevance to clinical practice</h4>The NEUMOBACT checklist can be useful for assessing skills before and after training in VAP and CRB prevention measures and during debriefing (post-simulation feedback), to reinforce the scientific evidence behind actions and decisions for items that have been performed incorrectly, thus consolidating training already received.
format Article
id doaj-art-6a168301f35a453f882f6c0e82e6ef5f
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-6a168301f35a453f882f6c0e82e6ef5f2025-01-08T05:32:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031317510.1371/journal.pone.0313175Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.Marta Raurell-TorredàIgnacio Zaragoza-GarcíaOscar ArroganteAnna María Aliberch-RaurellFrancisco Javier Sánchez-ChillónMartín Torralba-MeleroAndrés Rojo-RojoAlfonso Muriel-GarcíaAna Carolina Amaya AriasJuan Roldán-MerinoMariona Farrés-Tarafa<h4>Objective</h4>To analyse the interrater reliability of the NEUMOBACT checklist and verify whether consistent results are reproducible.<h4>Methods</h4>A validation study with a cross-sectional design, compliant with the GRRAS checklist, among ICU nurses attending a SIMULAZERO course with an Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation simulation format, to verify transfer from theory to clinical practice of knowledge and skills in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) prevention. A minimum sample size of 111 pairs of nurse raters was calculated. Interrater agreement was analysed using Gwet's AC1 for each item and as a total for each of the three checklists in the NEUMOBACT instrument.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 95 pairs of valid NEUMOBACT checklists were completed by 190 raters with a median age of 29 [25-35] years, 93.7% were female. At the Central Venous Catheter insertion station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.934 (95% CI [0.919-0.949]). Only 2 of the 17 items scored below 0.9. At the Endotracheal Suctioning station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.869 (95% CI [0.851-0.886]). Of the 26 items that made up this station, 16 had an agreement percentage above 0.9, a further 9 were between 0.821 and 0.884, and item 13 had a value of 0.789. At the Patient Care station, Gwet's AC1 was 0.911 (95% CI [0.896-0.927]). Of the 21 items, 17 showed an agreement percentage above 0.9 and 4 were between 0.810 and 0.894.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The interrater reliability of the NEUMOBACT checklist shows substantial agreement between pairs of raters and is therefore validated in this large sample of ICU nurses.<h4>Relevance to clinical practice</h4>The NEUMOBACT checklist can be useful for assessing skills before and after training in VAP and CRB prevention measures and during debriefing (post-simulation feedback), to reinforce the scientific evidence behind actions and decisions for items that have been performed incorrectly, thus consolidating training already received.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313175
spellingShingle Marta Raurell-Torredà
Ignacio Zaragoza-García
Oscar Arrogante
Anna María Aliberch-Raurell
Francisco Javier Sánchez-Chillón
Martín Torralba-Melero
Andrés Rojo-Rojo
Alfonso Muriel-García
Ana Carolina Amaya Arias
Juan Roldán-Merino
Mariona Farrés-Tarafa
Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
PLoS ONE
title Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
title_full Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
title_fullStr Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
title_full_unstemmed Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
title_short Interrater reliability and agreement of the NEUMOBACT checklist about infection-prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation-based scenarios.
title_sort interrater reliability and agreement of the neumobact checklist about infection prevention performance of intensive care nurses in simulation based scenarios
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313175
work_keys_str_mv AT martaraurelltorreda interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT ignaciozaragozagarcia interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT oscararrogante interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT annamariaaliberchraurell interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT franciscojaviersanchezchillon interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT martintorralbamelero interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT andresrojorojo interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT alfonsomurielgarcia interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT anacarolinaamayaarias interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT juanroldanmerino interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios
AT marionafarrestarafa interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheneumobactchecklistaboutinfectionpreventionperformanceofintensivecarenursesinsimulationbasedscenarios