Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews
Introduction Implementation science focuses on improving the dissemination, uptake and adoption of evidence into practice. Over the last decade, implementation science research has proliferated, particularly in healthcare and social science. The key synthesis of implementation frameworks conducted b...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e087628.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846170970551746560 |
|---|---|
| author | Jeffrey Braithwaite Louise A Ellis Søren Paaske Johnsen Kathrine Hald Julie Midtgaard Anne Gulbech Ording Lisa Pagano Georgia Fisher Samantha Spanos Martin Jorsal |
| author_facet | Jeffrey Braithwaite Louise A Ellis Søren Paaske Johnsen Kathrine Hald Julie Midtgaard Anne Gulbech Ording Lisa Pagano Georgia Fisher Samantha Spanos Martin Jorsal |
| author_sort | Jeffrey Braithwaite |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Implementation science focuses on improving the dissemination, uptake and adoption of evidence into practice. Over the last decade, implementation science research has proliferated, particularly in healthcare and social science. The key synthesis of implementation frameworks conducted by Meyers and colleagues in 2012, and the resulting Quality Implementation Framework, has yet to be updated to incorporate this research. This protocol proposes an umbrella review of reviews (RORs) to synthesise the literature since 2012 on implementation science in the fields of healthcare and social science and provides recommendations for an updated Quality Implementation Framework.Methods and analysis This ROR will be conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science) will be used to identify peer-reviewed meta-analyses, systematic reviews and scoping reviews published in the English language since January 2012 and report on the development, application or update of one or more implementation frameworks in healthcare or social science contexts. Multiple reviewers will be involved in the screening of articles and extraction of data, and the quality of reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) 2. The outcome of interest is the content of implementation science frameworks reported in the included reviews. The content of these frameworks will be synthesised, aggregated and mapped to the four phases and 14 steps outlined in the original Quality Implementation Framework using both deductive and inductive analysis.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required as this ROR protocol and the resulting ROR do not involve primary data collection. The protocol as well as the ROR will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023475994. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6824a43ae772449281084f36ff1b27bc |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-6824a43ae772449281084f36ff1b27bc2024-11-11T08:55:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-11-01141110.1136/bmjopen-2024-087628Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviewsJeffrey Braithwaite0Louise A Ellis1Søren Paaske Johnsen2Kathrine Hald3Julie Midtgaard4Anne Gulbech Ording5Lisa Pagano6Georgia Fisher7Samantha Spanos8Martin Jorsal95 Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia5 Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia1 Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark1 Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark4 Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health Care (CARMEN), Mental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital – Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark1 Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark5 Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia5 Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia5 Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia4 Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health Care (CARMEN), Mental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital – Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, DenmarkIntroduction Implementation science focuses on improving the dissemination, uptake and adoption of evidence into practice. Over the last decade, implementation science research has proliferated, particularly in healthcare and social science. The key synthesis of implementation frameworks conducted by Meyers and colleagues in 2012, and the resulting Quality Implementation Framework, has yet to be updated to incorporate this research. This protocol proposes an umbrella review of reviews (RORs) to synthesise the literature since 2012 on implementation science in the fields of healthcare and social science and provides recommendations for an updated Quality Implementation Framework.Methods and analysis This ROR will be conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science) will be used to identify peer-reviewed meta-analyses, systematic reviews and scoping reviews published in the English language since January 2012 and report on the development, application or update of one or more implementation frameworks in healthcare or social science contexts. Multiple reviewers will be involved in the screening of articles and extraction of data, and the quality of reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) 2. The outcome of interest is the content of implementation science frameworks reported in the included reviews. The content of these frameworks will be synthesised, aggregated and mapped to the four phases and 14 steps outlined in the original Quality Implementation Framework using both deductive and inductive analysis.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required as this ROR protocol and the resulting ROR do not involve primary data collection. The protocol as well as the ROR will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023475994.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e087628.full |
| spellingShingle | Jeffrey Braithwaite Louise A Ellis Søren Paaske Johnsen Kathrine Hald Julie Midtgaard Anne Gulbech Ording Lisa Pagano Georgia Fisher Samantha Spanos Martin Jorsal Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews BMJ Open |
| title | Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| title_full | Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| title_fullStr | Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| title_short | Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| title_sort | updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework a protocol for an umbrella review of reviews |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e087628.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jeffreybraithwaite updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT louiseaellis updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT sørenpaaskejohnsen updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT kathrinehald updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT juliemidtgaard updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT annegulbechording updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT lisapagano updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT georgiafisher updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT samanthaspanos updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews AT martinjorsal updatingthecriticalstepsofthequalityimplementationframeworkaprotocolforanumbrellareviewofreviews |