Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach

Abstract Background Physical activity (PA) may have an impact on cognitive function. Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used in dementia research, e.g., for diagnosis and risk stratification. Less is known about the value of ML for predicting cognitive decline in people with dementia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bettina Barisch-Fritz, Jay Shah, Jelena Krafft, Yonas E. Geda, Teresa Wu, Alexander Woll, Janina Krell-Roesch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00367-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544890009255936
author Bettina Barisch-Fritz
Jay Shah
Jelena Krafft
Yonas E. Geda
Teresa Wu
Alexander Woll
Janina Krell-Roesch
author_facet Bettina Barisch-Fritz
Jay Shah
Jelena Krafft
Yonas E. Geda
Teresa Wu
Alexander Woll
Janina Krell-Roesch
author_sort Bettina Barisch-Fritz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Physical activity (PA) may have an impact on cognitive function. Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used in dementia research, e.g., for diagnosis and risk stratification. Less is known about the value of ML for predicting cognitive decline in people with dementia (PwD). The aim of this study was to use an ML approach to identify variables associated with a multimodal PA intervention that may impact cognitive changes in PwD, i.e., by distinguishing between cognitive decliners and non-decliners. Methods This is a secondary, exploratory analysis using data from a Randomized Controlled Trial that included a 16-week multimodal PA intervention for the intervention group (IG) and treatment as usual for the control group (CG) in nursing homes. Predictors included in the ML models were related to the intervention (e.g., adherence), physical performance (e.g., mobility, balance), and pertinent health-related variables (e.g., health status, dementia form and severity). Primary outcomes were global and domain-specific cognitive performance (i.e., attention/ executive function, language, visuospatial skills, memory) assessed by standardized tests. A Support Vector Machine model was used to perform the classification of each primary outcome into the two classes of decline and non-decline. GridSearchCV with fivefold cross-validation was used for model training, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) and accuracy were calculated to assess model performance. Results The study sample consisted of 319 PwD (IG, N = 161; CG, N = 158). The proportion of PwD experiencing cognitive decline, in the different domains measured, ranged from 27–48% in CG, and from 23–49% in IG, with no statistically significant differences and no time*group effects. ML models showed accuracy and AUC values ranging from 40.6–75.6. The strongest predictors of cognitive decline or non-decline were performance of activities of daily living in IG and CG, and adherence and mobility in IG. Conclusions ML models showed moderate performance, suggesting that the selected variables only had limited value for classification, with adherence and performance of activities of daily living appearing to be predictors of cognitive decline. While the study provides preliminary evidence of the potential use of ML approaches, larger studies are needed to confirm our observations and to include other variables in the prediction of cognitive decline, such as emotional health or biomarker abnormalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-65d05a45a3944a8aa97279652d2a79a4
institution Kabale University
issn 1861-6909
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
spelling doaj-art-65d05a45a3944a8aa97279652d2a79a42025-01-12T12:11:49ZengBMCEuropean Review of Aging and Physical Activity1861-69092025-01-0122111310.1186/s11556-024-00367-2Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approachBettina Barisch-Fritz0Jay Shah1Jelena Krafft2Yonas E. Geda3Teresa Wu4Alexander Woll5Janina Krell-Roesch6Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyArizona State UniversityKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyBarrow Neurological InstituteArizona State UniversityKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyAbstract Background Physical activity (PA) may have an impact on cognitive function. Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used in dementia research, e.g., for diagnosis and risk stratification. Less is known about the value of ML for predicting cognitive decline in people with dementia (PwD). The aim of this study was to use an ML approach to identify variables associated with a multimodal PA intervention that may impact cognitive changes in PwD, i.e., by distinguishing between cognitive decliners and non-decliners. Methods This is a secondary, exploratory analysis using data from a Randomized Controlled Trial that included a 16-week multimodal PA intervention for the intervention group (IG) and treatment as usual for the control group (CG) in nursing homes. Predictors included in the ML models were related to the intervention (e.g., adherence), physical performance (e.g., mobility, balance), and pertinent health-related variables (e.g., health status, dementia form and severity). Primary outcomes were global and domain-specific cognitive performance (i.e., attention/ executive function, language, visuospatial skills, memory) assessed by standardized tests. A Support Vector Machine model was used to perform the classification of each primary outcome into the two classes of decline and non-decline. GridSearchCV with fivefold cross-validation was used for model training, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) and accuracy were calculated to assess model performance. Results The study sample consisted of 319 PwD (IG, N = 161; CG, N = 158). The proportion of PwD experiencing cognitive decline, in the different domains measured, ranged from 27–48% in CG, and from 23–49% in IG, with no statistically significant differences and no time*group effects. ML models showed accuracy and AUC values ranging from 40.6–75.6. The strongest predictors of cognitive decline or non-decline were performance of activities of daily living in IG and CG, and adherence and mobility in IG. Conclusions ML models showed moderate performance, suggesting that the selected variables only had limited value for classification, with adherence and performance of activities of daily living appearing to be predictors of cognitive decline. While the study provides preliminary evidence of the potential use of ML approaches, larger studies are needed to confirm our observations and to include other variables in the prediction of cognitive decline, such as emotional health or biomarker abnormalities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00367-2Cognitive deteriorationAlzheimer's diseaseNeurodegenerative diseasesMachine learningPhysical activity interventionsArtificial intelligence analysis
spellingShingle Bettina Barisch-Fritz
Jay Shah
Jelena Krafft
Yonas E. Geda
Teresa Wu
Alexander Woll
Janina Krell-Roesch
Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Cognitive deterioration
Alzheimer's disease
Neurodegenerative diseases
Machine learning
Physical activity interventions
Artificial intelligence analysis
title Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
title_full Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
title_fullStr Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
title_short Physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory: a machine learning approach
title_sort physical activity and the outcome of cognitive trajectory a machine learning approach
topic Cognitive deterioration
Alzheimer's disease
Neurodegenerative diseases
Machine learning
Physical activity interventions
Artificial intelligence analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00367-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bettinabarischfritz physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT jayshah physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT jelenakrafft physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT yonasegeda physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT teresawu physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT alexanderwoll physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach
AT janinakrellroesch physicalactivityandtheoutcomeofcognitivetrajectoryamachinelearningapproach