Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020

Abstract Background Obesity rates among children and adults continue to accelerate in the U.S., particularly among marginalized and low-income populations. Obesity prevention and reduction policies can significantly impact population health by improving environmental conditions and increasing access...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise D. Payán, Alec M. Chan-Golston, Kesia K. Garibay, Corbin Farias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20557-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846171560803565568
author Denise D. Payán
Alec M. Chan-Golston
Kesia K. Garibay
Corbin Farias
author_facet Denise D. Payán
Alec M. Chan-Golston
Kesia K. Garibay
Corbin Farias
author_sort Denise D. Payán
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Obesity rates among children and adults continue to accelerate in the U.S., particularly among marginalized and low-income populations. Obesity prevention and reduction policies can significantly impact population health by improving environmental conditions and increasing access to health-promoting resources. Limited research has been conducted to examine state obesity policy change over time. The primary aim of this study is to examine legislative approaches used to prevent and reduce obesity in the state of California (U.S.). Methods We used quantitative policy surveillance methods to develop a state database of obesity-related legislation (bills, resolutions) introduced in California’s legislature between 1999 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends of introduced and enacted policy by legislative and policy characteristics. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in characteristics between enacted and non-enacted legislation. Legislative session and policy characteristics found to be associated with enactment were used to predict adoption in a logistic regression. Results A total of 284 obesity-related bills and resolutions were introduced in California’s legislature between 1999 and 2020 with a peak of 43 in 2005–2006. On average, 25.8 bills and resolutions were introduced each 2-year legislative cycle. Findings indicate that (a) children and schools were the most frequently specified population and setting; (b) the most common policy topics were nutrition (45%) and physical activity (33%); and (c) only 15% of legislation mentioned race/ethnicity. Overall, 24.9% of bills were enacted compared to 82.1% of resolutions adopted. Legislation to raise awareness about obesity had 5.4 times the odds of being passed compared to other topics. Yet this difference was not statistically significant in a sensitivity analysis when we excluded resolutions. Conclusions This database can be leveraged to advance our knowledge of effective and equitable policy instruments to prevent and reduce obesity. Results reveal important policy elements that may impact legislative success, including policy topic, and contribute to a nascent evidence base for public health law research, legal epidemiology, and practice. Future work should investigate the role of policy effectiveness research and evidence on legislative policymaking.
format Article
id doaj-art-6576002781db4d798753d82f5778fb91
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-6576002781db4d798753d82f5778fb912024-11-10T12:45:58ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582024-11-012411810.1186/s12889-024-20557-yLongitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020Denise D. Payán0Alec M. Chan-Golston1Kesia K. Garibay2Corbin Farias3Department of Health, Society and Behavior, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, IrvineDepartment of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, MercedDepartment of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, MercedDepartment of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, MercedAbstract Background Obesity rates among children and adults continue to accelerate in the U.S., particularly among marginalized and low-income populations. Obesity prevention and reduction policies can significantly impact population health by improving environmental conditions and increasing access to health-promoting resources. Limited research has been conducted to examine state obesity policy change over time. The primary aim of this study is to examine legislative approaches used to prevent and reduce obesity in the state of California (U.S.). Methods We used quantitative policy surveillance methods to develop a state database of obesity-related legislation (bills, resolutions) introduced in California’s legislature between 1999 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to examine trends of introduced and enacted policy by legislative and policy characteristics. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in characteristics between enacted and non-enacted legislation. Legislative session and policy characteristics found to be associated with enactment were used to predict adoption in a logistic regression. Results A total of 284 obesity-related bills and resolutions were introduced in California’s legislature between 1999 and 2020 with a peak of 43 in 2005–2006. On average, 25.8 bills and resolutions were introduced each 2-year legislative cycle. Findings indicate that (a) children and schools were the most frequently specified population and setting; (b) the most common policy topics were nutrition (45%) and physical activity (33%); and (c) only 15% of legislation mentioned race/ethnicity. Overall, 24.9% of bills were enacted compared to 82.1% of resolutions adopted. Legislation to raise awareness about obesity had 5.4 times the odds of being passed compared to other topics. Yet this difference was not statistically significant in a sensitivity analysis when we excluded resolutions. Conclusions This database can be leveraged to advance our knowledge of effective and equitable policy instruments to prevent and reduce obesity. Results reveal important policy elements that may impact legislative success, including policy topic, and contribute to a nascent evidence base for public health law research, legal epidemiology, and practice. Future work should investigate the role of policy effectiveness research and evidence on legislative policymaking.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20557-yObesityPolicySurveillanceLawNutritionPhysical activity
spellingShingle Denise D. Payán
Alec M. Chan-Golston
Kesia K. Garibay
Corbin Farias
Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
BMC Public Health
Obesity
Policy
Surveillance
Law
Nutrition
Physical activity
title Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
title_full Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
title_fullStr Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
title_short Longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in California, 1999–2020
title_sort longitudinal policy surveillance of state obesity legislation in california 1999 2020
topic Obesity
Policy
Surveillance
Law
Nutrition
Physical activity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20557-y
work_keys_str_mv AT denisedpayan longitudinalpolicysurveillanceofstateobesitylegislationincalifornia19992020
AT alecmchangolston longitudinalpolicysurveillanceofstateobesitylegislationincalifornia19992020
AT kesiakgaribay longitudinalpolicysurveillanceofstateobesitylegislationincalifornia19992020
AT corbinfarias longitudinalpolicysurveillanceofstateobesitylegislationincalifornia19992020