A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.

In humans, simple 2D visual displays of launching events ("Michottean launches") can evoke the impression of causality. Direct launching events are regarded as causal, but similar events with a temporal and/or spatial gap between the movements of the two objects, as non-causal. This abilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Floor Meewis, Iris Barezzi, Joël Fagot, Nicolas Claidière, Isabelle Dautriche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311294
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846119269186666496
author Floor Meewis
Iris Barezzi
Joël Fagot
Nicolas Claidière
Isabelle Dautriche
author_facet Floor Meewis
Iris Barezzi
Joël Fagot
Nicolas Claidière
Isabelle Dautriche
author_sort Floor Meewis
collection DOAJ
description In humans, simple 2D visual displays of launching events ("Michottean launches") can evoke the impression of causality. Direct launching events are regarded as causal, but similar events with a temporal and/or spatial gap between the movements of the two objects, as non-causal. This ability to distinguish between causal and non-causal events is perceptual in nature and develops early and preverbally in infancy. In the present study we investigated the evolutionary origins of this phenomenon and tested whether Guinea baboons (Papio papio) perceive causality in launching events. We used a novel paradigm which was designed to distinguish between the use of causality and the use of spatiotemporal properties. Our results indicate that Guinea baboons successfully discriminate between different Michottean events, but we did not find a learning advantage for a categorisation based on causality as was the case for human adults. Our results imply that, contrary to humans, baboons focused on the spatial and temporal gaps to achieve accurate categorisation, but not on causality per se. Understanding how animals perceive causality is important to figure out whether non-human animals comprehend events similarly to humans. Our study hints at a different manner of processing physical causality for Guinea baboons and human adults.
format Article
id doaj-art-63ade0fff24c4b7c946452fe8c7962b3
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-63ade0fff24c4b7c946452fe8c7962b32024-12-17T05:31:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031129410.1371/journal.pone.0311294A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.Floor MeewisIris BarezziJoël FagotNicolas ClaidièreIsabelle DautricheIn humans, simple 2D visual displays of launching events ("Michottean launches") can evoke the impression of causality. Direct launching events are regarded as causal, but similar events with a temporal and/or spatial gap between the movements of the two objects, as non-causal. This ability to distinguish between causal and non-causal events is perceptual in nature and develops early and preverbally in infancy. In the present study we investigated the evolutionary origins of this phenomenon and tested whether Guinea baboons (Papio papio) perceive causality in launching events. We used a novel paradigm which was designed to distinguish between the use of causality and the use of spatiotemporal properties. Our results indicate that Guinea baboons successfully discriminate between different Michottean events, but we did not find a learning advantage for a categorisation based on causality as was the case for human adults. Our results imply that, contrary to humans, baboons focused on the spatial and temporal gaps to achieve accurate categorisation, but not on causality per se. Understanding how animals perceive causality is important to figure out whether non-human animals comprehend events similarly to humans. Our study hints at a different manner of processing physical causality for Guinea baboons and human adults.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311294
spellingShingle Floor Meewis
Iris Barezzi
Joël Fagot
Nicolas Claidière
Isabelle Dautriche
A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
PLoS ONE
title A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
title_full A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
title_fullStr A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
title_short A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.
title_sort comparative study of causal perception in guinea baboons papio papio and human adults
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311294
work_keys_str_mv AT floormeewis acomparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT irisbarezzi acomparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT joelfagot acomparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT nicolasclaidiere acomparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT isabelledautriche acomparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT floormeewis comparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT irisbarezzi comparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT joelfagot comparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT nicolasclaidiere comparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults
AT isabelledautriche comparativestudyofcausalperceptioninguineababoonspapiopapioandhumanadults