Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective. To explore the value of the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) for evaluating injuries and predicting complications (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and poor prognoses (in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, ICU admission, p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He Jin, Yuanyuan Zhang, Qi Zhang, Lijuan Ouyang, Xueyao Li, Yiyan Zhang, Baosheng Yang, Junfeng Sun, Chaohui Wei, Guimei Yang, Li Guan, Shilan Luo, Junyu Zhu, Huaping Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4861308
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561412493639680
author He Jin
Yuanyuan Zhang
Qi Zhang
Lijuan Ouyang
Xueyao Li
Yiyan Zhang
Baosheng Yang
Junfeng Sun
Chaohui Wei
Guimei Yang
Li Guan
Shilan Luo
Junyu Zhu
Huaping Liang
author_facet He Jin
Yuanyuan Zhang
Qi Zhang
Lijuan Ouyang
Xueyao Li
Yiyan Zhang
Baosheng Yang
Junfeng Sun
Chaohui Wei
Guimei Yang
Li Guan
Shilan Luo
Junyu Zhu
Huaping Liang
author_sort He Jin
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To explore the value of the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) for evaluating injuries and predicting complications (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and poor prognoses (in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay, and death) in patients with thoracic trauma. Methods. The data of consecutive patients with thoracic trauma who were admitted to the department of cardiothoracic surgery of a tertiary hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected. ISS and NISS were calculated for each patient. The study outcomes were complications and poor prognoses. The differences in ISS and NISS between patients with complications and poor prognoses and patients without the abovementioned conditions were compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test. Discrimination and calibration of ISS and NISS in predicting outcomes were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Hosmer‒Lemeshow (H-L) statistic. Results. A total of 310 patients were included. ISS and NISS of patients with complications and poor prognoses were greater than those of patients without complications and poor prognoses, respectively. The discrimination of ISS in predicting pneumonia, respiratory failure, in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay, and death (AUCs: 0.609, 0.721, 0.848, 0.784, 0.763, 0.716, and 0.804, respectively) was not statistically significantly different from that of NISS in predicting the corresponding outcomes (AUCs: 0.628, 0.712, 0.795, 0.767, 0.750, 0.750, and 0.818, respectively). ISS showed better calibration than NISS for predicting pneumonia, respiratory failure, in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, and ICU admission but worse calibration for predicting prolonged ICU stay and death. Conclusion. ISS and NISS are both suitable for injury evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference in discrimination between ISS and NISS, but they had different calibrations when predicting different outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-639deec48e184fc7bc71760c842d386d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-639deec48e184fc7bc71760c842d386d2025-01-03T01:41:25ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28592024-01-01202410.1155/2024/4861308Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort StudyHe Jin0Yuanyuan Zhang1Qi Zhang2Lijuan Ouyang3Xueyao Li4Yiyan Zhang5Baosheng Yang6Junfeng Sun7Chaohui Wei8Guimei Yang9Li Guan10Shilan Luo11Junyu Zhu12Huaping Liang13Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Disease Control and PreventionDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Cardiothoracic SurgeryDepartment of Orthopedic SurgeryDepartment of Burns and Plastic SurgeryDepartment of Wound Infection and DrugDepartment of Wound Infection and DrugObjective. To explore the value of the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) for evaluating injuries and predicting complications (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and poor prognoses (in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay, and death) in patients with thoracic trauma. Methods. The data of consecutive patients with thoracic trauma who were admitted to the department of cardiothoracic surgery of a tertiary hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected. ISS and NISS were calculated for each patient. The study outcomes were complications and poor prognoses. The differences in ISS and NISS between patients with complications and poor prognoses and patients without the abovementioned conditions were compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test. Discrimination and calibration of ISS and NISS in predicting outcomes were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Hosmer‒Lemeshow (H-L) statistic. Results. A total of 310 patients were included. ISS and NISS of patients with complications and poor prognoses were greater than those of patients without complications and poor prognoses, respectively. The discrimination of ISS in predicting pneumonia, respiratory failure, in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay, and death (AUCs: 0.609, 0.721, 0.848, 0.784, 0.763, 0.716, and 0.804, respectively) was not statistically significantly different from that of NISS in predicting the corresponding outcomes (AUCs: 0.628, 0.712, 0.795, 0.767, 0.750, 0.750, and 0.818, respectively). ISS showed better calibration than NISS for predicting pneumonia, respiratory failure, in-hospital tracheal intubation, extended length of hospital stay, and ICU admission but worse calibration for predicting prolonged ICU stay and death. Conclusion. ISS and NISS are both suitable for injury evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference in discrimination between ISS and NISS, but they had different calibrations when predicting different outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4861308
spellingShingle He Jin
Yuanyuan Zhang
Qi Zhang
Lijuan Ouyang
Xueyao Li
Yiyan Zhang
Baosheng Yang
Junfeng Sun
Chaohui Wei
Guimei Yang
Li Guan
Shilan Luo
Junyu Zhu
Huaping Liang
Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Emergency Medicine International
title Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of injury severity score iss and new injury severity score niss in the evaluation of thoracic trauma patients a retrospective cohort study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4861308
work_keys_str_mv AT hejin comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yuanyuanzhang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qizhang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lijuanouyang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xueyaoli comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yiyanzhang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT baoshengyang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT junfengsun comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chaohuiwei comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT guimeiyang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liguan comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shilanluo comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT junyuzhu comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huapingliang comparisonofinjuryseverityscoreissandnewinjuryseverityscorenissintheevaluationofthoracictraumapatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy