Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study

Background: Endometrioma, a common manifestation of endometriosis, often indicates the severity of the disease. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (ET) are key therapeutic strategies for infertility associated with endometriosis. However, the optimal type of ET (frozen or fresh) and its imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parisa Pirooznia, Mehri Mashayekhi, Firouzeh Ghaffari, Nadia Jahangiri, Zahra Zolfaghari, Firoozeh Ahmadi, Fateme Hasani, Nima Narimani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://knepublishing.com/index.php/ijrm/article/view/17819
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527826630574080
author Parisa Pirooznia
Mehri Mashayekhi
Firouzeh Ghaffari
Nadia Jahangiri
Zahra Zolfaghari
Firoozeh Ahmadi
Fateme Hasani
Nima Narimani
author_facet Parisa Pirooznia
Mehri Mashayekhi
Firouzeh Ghaffari
Nadia Jahangiri
Zahra Zolfaghari
Firoozeh Ahmadi
Fateme Hasani
Nima Narimani
author_sort Parisa Pirooznia
collection DOAJ
description Background: Endometrioma, a common manifestation of endometriosis, often indicates the severity of the disease. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (ET) are key therapeutic strategies for infertility associated with endometriosis. However, the optimal type of ET (frozen or fresh) and its impact on pregnancy success rates remain debated, with limited studies available. Objective: This historical cohort study aimed to compare fertility and neonatal outcomes, focusing on live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates in women with endometrioma-associated infertility, between fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET). Materials and Methods: In this historical cohort study, the medical records (files) of 289 women diagnosed with endometrioma-related infertility, who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment at Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran between March 2016–2021 were reviewed. Ultimately, 200 files that met the established criteria were selected for review. The extracted data was then compared between groups: FET (n = 121) and fresh ET (n = 79). Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics and endometrioma size. The only significant difference in fertility outcomes was the LBR, which was 36.4% for the FET group compared to 22.8% for the fresh ET group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in neonatal outcomes between the groups. Overall, our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma.  Conclusion: Our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma.
format Article
id doaj-art-62e4d739fd4446aa8fc39f98f8d6decc
institution Kabale University
issn 2476-4108
2476-3772
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
spelling doaj-art-62e4d739fd4446aa8fc39f98f8d6decc2025-01-15T06:16:57ZengShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine2476-41082476-37722025-01-01221110.18502/ijrm.v22i11.17819Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort studyParisa Pirooznia0Mehri Mashayekhi1Firouzeh Ghaffari2Nadia Jahangiri3Zahra Zolfaghari4 Firoozeh Ahmadi5Fateme Hasani6Nima Narimani7Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Basic and Population Based Studies in NCD, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Reproductive Imaging, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Hasheminejad Kidney Centre, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran. Background: Endometrioma, a common manifestation of endometriosis, often indicates the severity of the disease. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (ET) are key therapeutic strategies for infertility associated with endometriosis. However, the optimal type of ET (frozen or fresh) and its impact on pregnancy success rates remain debated, with limited studies available. Objective: This historical cohort study aimed to compare fertility and neonatal outcomes, focusing on live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates in women with endometrioma-associated infertility, between fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET). Materials and Methods: In this historical cohort study, the medical records (files) of 289 women diagnosed with endometrioma-related infertility, who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment at Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran between March 2016–2021 were reviewed. Ultimately, 200 files that met the established criteria were selected for review. The extracted data was then compared between groups: FET (n = 121) and fresh ET (n = 79). Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics and endometrioma size. The only significant difference in fertility outcomes was the LBR, which was 36.4% for the FET group compared to 22.8% for the fresh ET group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in neonatal outcomes between the groups. Overall, our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma.  Conclusion: Our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/ijrm/article/view/17819Endometrioma, Embryo transfer, Assisted reproductive technique, Treatment outcome, Pregnancy outcome.
spellingShingle Parisa Pirooznia
Mehri Mashayekhi
Firouzeh Ghaffari
Nadia Jahangiri
Zahra Zolfaghari
Firoozeh Ahmadi
Fateme Hasani
Nima Narimani
Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
Endometrioma, Embryo transfer, Assisted reproductive technique, Treatment outcome, Pregnancy outcome.
title Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
title_full Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
title_fullStr Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
title_short Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study
title_sort improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma a historical cohort study
topic Endometrioma, Embryo transfer, Assisted reproductive technique, Treatment outcome, Pregnancy outcome.
url https://knepublishing.com/index.php/ijrm/article/view/17819
work_keys_str_mv AT parisapirooznia improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT mehrimashayekhi improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT firouzehghaffari improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT nadiajahangiri improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT zahrazolfaghari improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT firoozehahmadi improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT fatemehasani improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy
AT nimanarimani improvingreproductiveoutcomesinfrozenembryotransferoverfreshembryotransferinwomenwithendometriomaahistoricalcohortstudy