No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer

ObjectiveWe investigated whether the addition of a luteal phase support drug benefits pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in modified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (mNC-FET) for women up to the age of 35 years.MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data of 3658 mNC-FET cycles of women up to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Zhang, Sheling Wu, Bingnan Ren, Ruolin Jia, Wenjuan Zhang, Bijun Wang, Xiaofang Du, Yichun Guan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1458527/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527898957152256
author Wen Zhang
Sheling Wu
Bingnan Ren
Ruolin Jia
Wenjuan Zhang
Bijun Wang
Xiaofang Du
Yichun Guan
author_facet Wen Zhang
Sheling Wu
Bingnan Ren
Ruolin Jia
Wenjuan Zhang
Bijun Wang
Xiaofang Du
Yichun Guan
author_sort Wen Zhang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveWe investigated whether the addition of a luteal phase support drug benefits pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in modified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (mNC-FET) for women up to the age of 35 years.MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data of 3658 mNC-FET cycles of women up to the age of 35 years from the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to December 2020 in a retrospective cohort study. The cycles were divided into three groups based on the luteal phase support protocol used. The patients in group A received a combination of progesterone soft capsules and dydrogesterone (882 cycles), those in group B received dydrogesterone only (627 cycles), and those in group C received a combination of progesterone vaginal sustained-release gel and dydrogesterone (2149 cycles). Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were compared among the three groups.ResultsLogistic regression analysis indicated that the three luteal phase support regimens were not associated with the live birth rate [OR(95% CI)B vs A=1.080, p=0.960; OR(95% CI)B vs C=0.252, p=0.291]. There were no significant differences in the newborn weight, premature delivery rate, pregnancy complications rate, and incidence of birth defects among the three groups.ConclusionsIn the mNC-FET cycle, patients under the age of 35 who chose dydrogesterone alone as a luteal phase support drug exhibited no difference in the live birth rate and perinatal outcome from patients who combined dydrogesterone with progesterone soft capsules or with progesterone vaginal sustained-release gel. However, the outcome still requires confirmation by large-sample prospective studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-627c7ecc0d1d4b98a09e3e27c8d874a3
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-2392
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj-art-627c7ecc0d1d4b98a09e3e27c8d874a32025-01-15T05:10:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922025-01-011510.3389/fendo.2024.14585271458527No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transferWen ZhangSheling WuBingnan RenRuolin JiaWenjuan ZhangBijun WangXiaofang DuYichun GuanObjectiveWe investigated whether the addition of a luteal phase support drug benefits pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in modified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (mNC-FET) for women up to the age of 35 years.MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data of 3658 mNC-FET cycles of women up to the age of 35 years from the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to December 2020 in a retrospective cohort study. The cycles were divided into three groups based on the luteal phase support protocol used. The patients in group A received a combination of progesterone soft capsules and dydrogesterone (882 cycles), those in group B received dydrogesterone only (627 cycles), and those in group C received a combination of progesterone vaginal sustained-release gel and dydrogesterone (2149 cycles). Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were compared among the three groups.ResultsLogistic regression analysis indicated that the three luteal phase support regimens were not associated with the live birth rate [OR(95% CI)B vs A=1.080, p=0.960; OR(95% CI)B vs C=0.252, p=0.291]. There were no significant differences in the newborn weight, premature delivery rate, pregnancy complications rate, and incidence of birth defects among the three groups.ConclusionsIn the mNC-FET cycle, patients under the age of 35 who chose dydrogesterone alone as a luteal phase support drug exhibited no difference in the live birth rate and perinatal outcome from patients who combined dydrogesterone with progesterone soft capsules or with progesterone vaginal sustained-release gel. However, the outcome still requires confirmation by large-sample prospective studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1458527/fullmodified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transferpregnancy outcomeluteal phase supportperinatal outcomeIVF/ICSI
spellingShingle Wen Zhang
Sheling Wu
Bingnan Ren
Ruolin Jia
Wenjuan Zhang
Bijun Wang
Xiaofang Du
Yichun Guan
No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
Frontiers in Endocrinology
modified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer
pregnancy outcome
luteal phase support
perinatal outcome
IVF/ICSI
title No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
title_full No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
title_fullStr No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
title_full_unstemmed No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
title_short No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
title_sort no improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer
topic modified natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer
pregnancy outcome
luteal phase support
perinatal outcome
IVF/ICSI
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1458527/full
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzhang noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT shelingwu noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT bingnanren noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT ruolinjia noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT wenjuanzhang noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT bijunwang noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT xiaofangdu noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer
AT yichunguan noimprovementinpregnancyandperinataloutcomeswithcombinedlutealsupportinmodifiednaturalcyclefrozenembryotransfer