Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach
One of the controversial issues in morphophonological studies is Phonologically-Conditioned Suppletion. Using a cognitive approach, the present study shows the existence of this phenomenon in Azerbaijani. Under Langacker’s (1987) Rule/List Fallacy, the lexicon contains unpredictable as well as predi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2021-09-01
|
Series: | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_5137_5337a0e3aa90bf68619c67470aa08aa9.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841527751944699904 |
---|---|
author | Saeed Rahandaz Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan |
author_facet | Saeed Rahandaz Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan |
author_sort | Saeed Rahandaz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | One of the controversial issues in morphophonological studies is Phonologically-Conditioned Suppletion. Using a cognitive approach, the present study shows the existence of this phenomenon in Azerbaijani. Under Langacker’s (1987) Rule/List Fallacy, the lexicon contains unpredictable as well as predictable information. This paves the way for a better explanation of the lexicalization of phonological processes. Following Langacker’s Rule/List Fallacy and Bybee’s (2001) early morphologization (or lexicalization) of phonological processes, the authors believe that the lexicalization of such processes has occurred in Azerbaijani. Those processes are not productive anymore and they only exist as residues in the lexicon. In some cases, those residues are suppletive forms and the choice between them depends on the phonological context. The authors’ analysis is different from the other researchers’ generative analyses in which they have tried to explain such cases in terms of phonological processes. Nesset’s (2008) cognitive model is used to demonstrate the representations and relations between the allomorphs. This model is based on Langacker’s (1987) ideas and to date, it is one of the few “cognitive phonology” models in cognitive and usage-based linguistics. Wherever not referenced, the data in this paper is gathered by recording Azerbaijani speakers. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-60fde50708294e4caff97b45ac2ac468 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2008-9570 2717-090X |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
publisher | Semnan University |
record_format | Article |
series | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
spelling | doaj-art-60fde50708294e4caff97b45ac2ac4682025-01-15T08:09:45ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات زبانی و بلاغی2008-95702717-090X2021-09-01122512715810.22075/jlrs.2020.19756.16685137Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive ApproachSaeed Rahandaz0Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan1Department of Linguistics, Bu-Ali Sina University, HamedanAssociate Professor of Linguistics, Bu-Ali Sina UniversityOne of the controversial issues in morphophonological studies is Phonologically-Conditioned Suppletion. Using a cognitive approach, the present study shows the existence of this phenomenon in Azerbaijani. Under Langacker’s (1987) Rule/List Fallacy, the lexicon contains unpredictable as well as predictable information. This paves the way for a better explanation of the lexicalization of phonological processes. Following Langacker’s Rule/List Fallacy and Bybee’s (2001) early morphologization (or lexicalization) of phonological processes, the authors believe that the lexicalization of such processes has occurred in Azerbaijani. Those processes are not productive anymore and they only exist as residues in the lexicon. In some cases, those residues are suppletive forms and the choice between them depends on the phonological context. The authors’ analysis is different from the other researchers’ generative analyses in which they have tried to explain such cases in terms of phonological processes. Nesset’s (2008) cognitive model is used to demonstrate the representations and relations between the allomorphs. This model is based on Langacker’s (1987) ideas and to date, it is one of the few “cognitive phonology” models in cognitive and usage-based linguistics. Wherever not referenced, the data in this paper is gathered by recording Azerbaijani speakers.https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_5137_5337a0e3aa90bf68619c67470aa08aa9.pdfcognitive phonologysuppletionazerbaijanilexicalizationrule/list fallacy |
spellingShingle | Saeed Rahandaz Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی cognitive phonology suppletion azerbaijani lexicalization rule/list fallacy |
title | Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach |
title_full | Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach |
title_fullStr | Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach |
title_short | Phonologically Conditioned Suppletion in Azerbaijani: A Cognitive Approach |
title_sort | phonologically conditioned suppletion in azerbaijani a cognitive approach |
topic | cognitive phonology suppletion azerbaijani lexicalization rule/list fallacy |
url | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_5137_5337a0e3aa90bf68619c67470aa08aa9.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saeedrahandaz phonologicallyconditionedsuppletioninazerbaijaniacognitiveapproach AT mehrdadnaghzguykohan phonologicallyconditionedsuppletioninazerbaijaniacognitiveapproach |