Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives To summarise the evidence regarding the prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes compared with the general population.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Five electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Runacres, Zoe A Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-12-01
Series:BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Online Access:https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/10/4/e001867.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846116572823814144
author Adam Runacres
Zoe A Marshall
author_facet Adam Runacres
Zoe A Marshall
author_sort Adam Runacres
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To summarise the evidence regarding the prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes compared with the general population.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Five electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searched from 1970 to 2023.Eligibility criteria Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they: (1) were written in English; (2) included male or female elite athletes that had been retired ≥1 year; (3) included a control group or population reference values; (4) reported the time-point prevalence of anxiety and/or depression; and (5) were of a retrospective, longitudinal or prospective, methodological design. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to determine risk of bias.Results 37 unique studies including 24 732 former athletes (2% female) were included in the meta-analysis. The time-point prevalence of anxiety (prevalence ratio (PR): 2.08 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.60)) and depression (PR: 2.58 (95% CI 2.04 to 3.12)) in former athletes was over twice that of the general population. Subgroup analyses revealed former American football players and jockeys had the highest time-point prevalence of both anxiety and depression (PR: 2.24–2.88), whereas the time-point prevalence of depression and anxiety was not significantly different to the general population for former rugby players (PR: 1.13–1.30).Conclusion Our meta-analyses demonstrated the time-point prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes could be over twice that of the general population, with sport-specific differences evident.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022347359.
format Article
id doaj-art-603dceb3831842009c41bb353cec7ca7
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-7647
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
spelling doaj-art-603dceb3831842009c41bb353cec7ca72024-12-18T16:05:34ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine2055-76472024-12-0110410.1136/bmjsem-2023-001867Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysisAdam Runacres0Zoe A Marshall11Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK2 School of Health & Sport Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UKObjectives To summarise the evidence regarding the prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes compared with the general population.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Five electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searched from 1970 to 2023.Eligibility criteria Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they: (1) were written in English; (2) included male or female elite athletes that had been retired ≥1 year; (3) included a control group or population reference values; (4) reported the time-point prevalence of anxiety and/or depression; and (5) were of a retrospective, longitudinal or prospective, methodological design. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to determine risk of bias.Results 37 unique studies including 24 732 former athletes (2% female) were included in the meta-analysis. The time-point prevalence of anxiety (prevalence ratio (PR): 2.08 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.60)) and depression (PR: 2.58 (95% CI 2.04 to 3.12)) in former athletes was over twice that of the general population. Subgroup analyses revealed former American football players and jockeys had the highest time-point prevalence of both anxiety and depression (PR: 2.24–2.88), whereas the time-point prevalence of depression and anxiety was not significantly different to the general population for former rugby players (PR: 1.13–1.30).Conclusion Our meta-analyses demonstrated the time-point prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes could be over twice that of the general population, with sport-specific differences evident.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022347359.https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/10/4/e001867.full
spellingShingle Adam Runacres
Zoe A Marshall
Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
title Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of anxiety and depression in former elite athletes a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/10/4/e001867.full
work_keys_str_mv AT adamrunacres prevalenceofanxietyanddepressioninformereliteathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zoeamarshall prevalenceofanxietyanddepressioninformereliteathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis