Comparative Evaluation of Canal Transport and Centralization Between ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Systems Using CBCT Analysis: An In Vitro Study
Conclusions: Both buccolingually and mesiodistally, PTN led to greater apical transport than XPS and also showed a lower centering ratio.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Hamed Karkehabadi, Abbas Shokri, Negar Banitalebi, Roshanak Abbasi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7245596 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Shaping Ability of XP Endo Shaper File in Curved Root Canal Models
by: Abdulmohsen Alfadley, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Debris Extrusion Using Reciproc Blue and XP Endo Shaper Systems in Root Canal Retreatment
by: Taher AlOmari, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Evaluation of centering ability of XP endo shaper, Edge Evolve and Hyflex CM in simulated curved canals
by: Van B. Werdina, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
A Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Dentinal Cracks at Different Instrumentation Lengths by Using Different Rotary Files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): An Ex Vivo Study
by: Fauzia Ashraf, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Comparison of mechanical properties and shaping performance of ProGlider and ProTaper ultimate slider
by: Jeyi Song, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)