Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito

Through anthropology, the notion of culture has been introduced into the study of risks and natural disasters in order to understand the production of meaning, a contribution that goes beyond the positions of physical and probabilistic sciences. This article incorporates the notion of inhabiting to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfredo Santillán, Elisa Puga-Cevallos
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador 2023-01-01
Series:Íconos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/5511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841524349888102400
author Alfredo Santillán
Elisa Puga-Cevallos
author_facet Alfredo Santillán
Elisa Puga-Cevallos
author_sort Alfredo Santillán
collection DOAJ
description Through anthropology, the notion of culture has been introduced into the study of risks and natural disasters in order to understand the production of meaning, a contribution that goes beyond the positions of physical and probabilistic sciences. This article incorporates the notion of inhabiting to the debate, considering the modes and tensions of the daily reproduction of life in territories considered risky. Two neighborhoods are considered – which are similar in terms of context but have different qualities – through ethnographic methods that capture cognitive processes and strategies of adaptation and coexistence for guaranteeing material and symbolic permanence. This focus contributes to the debate on biases regarding risk management that, in practice, tend to abstract them from the space in which they are located and contributes to making explicit the divergences between the analyses of scientists, institutions, and populations. Through the observation of processes of domestication of space and the rationalities that underly them, the categorization of risk is debated as a mechanism for dealing with a context of economic dearth and absence of basic services. It is concluded that, for understanding the positions of people in relation to contingency or their proximity to a harm, one must consider their emotional attachments, their forms of inhabiting territory, and their perspectives of the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-5eb0e24fd7ca4b6484416dba4f34008e
institution Kabale University
issn 1390-1249
2224-6983
language Spanish
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador
record_format Article
series Íconos
spelling doaj-art-5eb0e24fd7ca4b6484416dba4f34008e2025-02-03T07:12:16ZspaFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede EcuadorÍconos1390-12492224-69832023-01-0127758110210.17141/iconos.75.2023.5511Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of QuitoAlfredo Santillán0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9823-7396Elisa Puga-Cevallos1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-1836FLACSO EcuadorInvestigadora independienteThrough anthropology, the notion of culture has been introduced into the study of risks and natural disasters in order to understand the production of meaning, a contribution that goes beyond the positions of physical and probabilistic sciences. This article incorporates the notion of inhabiting to the debate, considering the modes and tensions of the daily reproduction of life in territories considered risky. Two neighborhoods are considered – which are similar in terms of context but have different qualities – through ethnographic methods that capture cognitive processes and strategies of adaptation and coexistence for guaranteeing material and symbolic permanence. This focus contributes to the debate on biases regarding risk management that, in practice, tend to abstract them from the space in which they are located and contributes to making explicit the divergences between the analyses of scientists, institutions, and populations. Through the observation of processes of domestication of space and the rationalities that underly them, the categorization of risk is debated as a mechanism for dealing with a context of economic dearth and absence of basic services. It is concluded that, for understanding the positions of people in relation to contingency or their proximity to a harm, one must consider their emotional attachments, their forms of inhabiting territory, and their perspectives of the future.https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/5511urban anthropologyinformal settlementscreation of placeinhabitingproduction of habitatdisaster risk
spellingShingle Alfredo Santillán
Elisa Puga-Cevallos
Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
Íconos
urban anthropology
informal settlements
creation of place
inhabiting
production of habitat
disaster risk
title Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
title_full Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
title_fullStr Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
title_full_unstemmed Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
title_short Inhabiting territories at risk: Spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of Quito
title_sort inhabiting territories at risk spatial appropriations and symbolic disputes in two peripheral neighborhoods of quito
topic urban anthropology
informal settlements
creation of place
inhabiting
production of habitat
disaster risk
url https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/iconos/article/view/5511
work_keys_str_mv AT alfredosantillan inhabitingterritoriesatriskspatialappropriationsandsymbolicdisputesintwoperipheralneighborhoodsofquito
AT elisapugacevallos inhabitingterritoriesatriskspatialappropriationsandsymbolicdisputesintwoperipheralneighborhoodsofquito