ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK
Article 197(1) of Law no. 8/1996 on copyright and related rights, republished, criminally sanctions the appropriation of a work or part of a work by a person who has not contributed to the creation of that work and who presents it as his/her own creation. The act of appropriating a work or part of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F4_CKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW%252FCKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW_011.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841562920890138624 |
|---|---|
| author | Ciprian Raul ROMIȚAN |
| author_facet | Ciprian Raul ROMIȚAN |
| author_sort | Ciprian Raul ROMIȚAN |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Article 197(1) of Law no. 8/1996 on copyright and related rights, republished, criminally sanctions the appropriation of a work or part of a work by a person who has not contributed to the creation of that work and who presents it as his/her own creation. The act of appropriating a work or part of a work can be done in various ways, such as: publishing works under one's own name, as if it were made by the author, signing an intellectual creation, as co-author, in the literary, scientific, musical, artistic or fine art field without having any contribution to its creation, etc. Analysis of the legal text shows that the material element of this offense consists of two cumulative actions, namely the act of appropriating, without right, in whole or in part, the work of another author and the act of presenting it as one's own intellectual creation. At the same time, the analysis of the author of this study shows that in order to be able to prove the commission of this offense it is necessary that the appropriation is followed by the presentation of the work as one's own creation. It should be emphasised that in the absence of the action of presentation, it cannot be held that the offense provided for and punished by art. 197(1) of Law 8/1996 on copyright and related rights, republished, has been committed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5e968cdc425643d5be6566a3c9636bd3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-5e968cdc425643d5be6566a3c9636bd32025-01-03T00:37:53ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962024-05-01171564570ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORKCiprian Raul ROMIȚAN0Associate Professor, PhD, Faculty of Law, Romanian-American University; Associate Scientific Researcher, Institute of Legal Research „Acad. Andrei Rădulescu”, Romanian Academy; Editor-in-Chief of Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietății Intelectuale (Romanian Magazine of Intellectual Property Law); Lawyer partner of SCA „Roș and Asociatii”Article 197(1) of Law no. 8/1996 on copyright and related rights, republished, criminally sanctions the appropriation of a work or part of a work by a person who has not contributed to the creation of that work and who presents it as his/her own creation. The act of appropriating a work or part of a work can be done in various ways, such as: publishing works under one's own name, as if it were made by the author, signing an intellectual creation, as co-author, in the literary, scientific, musical, artistic or fine art field without having any contribution to its creation, etc. Analysis of the legal text shows that the material element of this offense consists of two cumulative actions, namely the act of appropriating, without right, in whole or in part, the work of another author and the act of presenting it as one's own intellectual creation. At the same time, the analysis of the author of this study shows that in order to be able to prove the commission of this offense it is necessary that the appropriation is followed by the presentation of the work as one's own creation. It should be emphasised that in the absence of the action of presentation, it cannot be held that the offense provided for and punished by art. 197(1) of Law 8/1996 on copyright and related rights, republished, has been committed.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F4_CKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW%252FCKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW_011.pdfworkcopyrightappropriation of authorshipwithout rightprerequisiteplagiarismoriginality |
| spellingShingle | Ciprian Raul ROMIȚAN ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK Challenges of the Knowledge Society work copyright appropriation of authorship without right prerequisite plagiarism originality |
| title | ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK |
| title_full | ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK |
| title_fullStr | ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK |
| title_full_unstemmed | ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK |
| title_short | ABOUT THE PREREQUISITE SITUATION IN THE CASE OF THE OFFENSE OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF A WORK |
| title_sort | about the prerequisite situation in the case of the offense of misappropriation of a work |
| topic | work copyright appropriation of authorship without right prerequisite plagiarism originality |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F4_CKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW%252FCKS_2024_INTELLECTUAL_PROPERTY_LAW_011.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ciprianraulromitan abouttheprerequisitesituationinthecaseoftheoffenseofmisappropriationofawork |