Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study
Aim. To compare the microleakage in class II composite restorations without a liner/with resin modified glass ionomer and flowable composite liner. Method. Forty standardized MO cavities were prepared on human permanent mandibular molars extracted for periodontal reasons and then divided into 4 grou...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Vedavathi Bore Gowda, B. V. Sreenivasa Murthy, Swaroop Hegde, Swapna Devarasanahalli Venkataramanaswamy, Veena Suresh Pai, Rashmi Krishna |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Scientifica |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/896507 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations
by: Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations in Class V Cavities
by: Ayşe Aslı Şenol, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Microleakage Evaluation of Two Methacrylate-Based Composites (GC Kalore and Luna SDI) in Class II Restorations: A Laboratory Study
by: Kooshan Moradi, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Restorative Materials – An in vitro Study
by: Hetal Khuva, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Comparison of Adaptation and Microleakage of CAD/CAM Restorations to Inlay Cavities Prepared by Using Different Finishing Methods
by: Ayben Şentürk, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)