Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience
OBJECTIVE. To investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS) treatment of upper ureteric stones between 10 to 20 mm in size. From January 2020 to January 2023, 75 patients were treated for proximal ureteric calculus between using ESW...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/2362 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846155561812361216 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Pushpanathan O. A. Fahmy CKS Lee M. G. Khairul-Asri |
| author_facet | M. Pushpanathan O. A. Fahmy CKS Lee M. G. Khairul-Asri |
| author_sort | M. Pushpanathan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | OBJECTIVE. To investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS) treatment of upper ureteric stones between 10 to 20 mm in size. From January 2020 to January 2023, 75 patients were treated for proximal ureteric calculus between using ESWL (n=40) & URS (n=35).METHODS AND MATERIALS. Both groups were compared regarding operative time, success rate and complications who underwent treatment for proximal ureteric calculus of 10–20 mm in diameter. URS group was observed to have higher stone-free rate, compared to the ESWL group, 31 (88.6 %) vs 20 patients (50.0 %) (p<0.001).RESULTS. URS treatment had a higher complication rate compared to the ESWL, 9 (25.7 %) vs 3(7.5 %) ;( p=0.032). Procedure time for URS was longer, compared to the ESWL, median (IQR) for URS vs ESWL were 78.0 (65.0, 100.0) vs 62.0 (48.0, 67.0) minutes; (p<0.001).CONCLUSION. We conclude that URS has a better stone-free rate in comparison to a single session of ESWL for upper ureteral calculus of 10–20 mm, with higher complication rates such as post-operative fever and pain. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5e043ec99b5d4c8388f9cd65c8dddb64 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0042-4625 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова |
| spelling | doaj-art-5e043ec99b5d4c8388f9cd65c8dddb642024-11-26T10:43:58ZrusPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityВестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова0042-46252024-06-011826273110.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-6-27-311593Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experienceM. Pushpanathan0O. A. Fahmy1CKS Lee2M. G. Khairul-Asri3Department of Urology, Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, University Putra MalaysiaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra MalaysiaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra MalaysiaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra MalaysiaOBJECTIVE. To investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS) treatment of upper ureteric stones between 10 to 20 mm in size. From January 2020 to January 2023, 75 patients were treated for proximal ureteric calculus between using ESWL (n=40) & URS (n=35).METHODS AND MATERIALS. Both groups were compared regarding operative time, success rate and complications who underwent treatment for proximal ureteric calculus of 10–20 mm in diameter. URS group was observed to have higher stone-free rate, compared to the ESWL group, 31 (88.6 %) vs 20 patients (50.0 %) (p<0.001).RESULTS. URS treatment had a higher complication rate compared to the ESWL, 9 (25.7 %) vs 3(7.5 %) ;( p=0.032). Procedure time for URS was longer, compared to the ESWL, median (IQR) for URS vs ESWL were 78.0 (65.0, 100.0) vs 62.0 (48.0, 67.0) minutes; (p<0.001).CONCLUSION. We conclude that URS has a better stone-free rate in comparison to a single session of ESWL for upper ureteral calculus of 10–20 mm, with higher complication rates such as post-operative fever and pain.https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/2362urolithiasisproximal ureteric calculusureteroscopylithotripsyextracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy |
| spellingShingle | M. Pushpanathan O. A. Fahmy CKS Lee M. G. Khairul-Asri Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова urolithiasis proximal ureteric calculus ureteroscopy lithotripsy extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy |
| title | Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience |
| title_full | Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience |
| title_fullStr | Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience |
| title_full_unstemmed | Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience |
| title_short | Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteric Calculus of 10 to 20 mm in Size: A single centre experience |
| title_sort | extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in proximal ureteric calculus of 10 to 20 mm in size a single centre experience |
| topic | urolithiasis proximal ureteric calculus ureteroscopy lithotripsy extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy |
| url | https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/2362 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mpushpanathan extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyversusureteroscopiclaserlithotripsyinproximaluretericcalculusof10to20mminsizeasinglecentreexperience AT oafahmy extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyversusureteroscopiclaserlithotripsyinproximaluretericcalculusof10to20mminsizeasinglecentreexperience AT ckslee extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyversusureteroscopiclaserlithotripsyinproximaluretericcalculusof10to20mminsizeasinglecentreexperience AT mgkhairulasri extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyversusureteroscopiclaserlithotripsyinproximaluretericcalculusof10to20mminsizeasinglecentreexperience |