TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU

THE TERM IN WHICH A PROFESSIONAL PROXY MUST MAKE THE REQUIRED PAYMENT FOR AN APPEAL AGAINST A RULING DISMISSING PROCEEDINGS Summary The aim of this paper is to answer the question whether the provisions of Art. 1302 § 2 of the Polish Civil Proceedings Code (k.p.c.) are applicable in the event of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grzegorz Jędrejek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2016-12-01
Series:Zeszyty Prawnicze
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/801
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846154912831897600
author Grzegorz Jędrejek
author_facet Grzegorz Jędrejek
author_sort Grzegorz Jędrejek
collection DOAJ
description THE TERM IN WHICH A PROFESSIONAL PROXY MUST MAKE THE REQUIRED PAYMENT FOR AN APPEAL AGAINST A RULING DISMISSING PROCEEDINGS Summary The aim of this paper is to answer the question whether the provisions of Art. 1302 § 2 of the Polish Civil Proceedings Code (k.p.c.) are applicable in the event of an appeal against a ruling to dismiss a case on grounds of non-payment of the court fee. Doubts have been raised on the admissibility of payment by a professional attorney within a term of seven days of the service of a court’s decision to dismiss a case. Under Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c. the legislator has allowed for payment of the court fee due within a term of one week from the day on which notice is served on the court’s decision to dismiss the case. The position of the author of this paper is that the term of seven days provided for the remittance of the court fee due in the event of an appeal, as defined in Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c., starts on the day notice is served on the court’s decision to dismiss a case. Any other position on the matter would be in breach of the legal principles at the root of an individual’s right of access to the law and his right to appeal, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, as well as in breach of the prohibition of reformationis in peius. The lodging of an appeal cannot lead to the dismissal of the civil recovery proceedings defined in Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c.
format Article
id doaj-art-5dac876cf7964d0f8d310e18c6c07845
institution Kabale University
issn 1643-8183
2353-8139
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Zeszyty Prawnicze
spelling doaj-art-5dac876cf7964d0f8d310e18c6c078452024-11-26T17:29:42ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieZeszyty Prawnicze1643-81832353-81392016-12-0113310.21697/zp.2013.13.3.06TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWUGrzegorz Jędrejek0Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego THE TERM IN WHICH A PROFESSIONAL PROXY MUST MAKE THE REQUIRED PAYMENT FOR AN APPEAL AGAINST A RULING DISMISSING PROCEEDINGS Summary The aim of this paper is to answer the question whether the provisions of Art. 1302 § 2 of the Polish Civil Proceedings Code (k.p.c.) are applicable in the event of an appeal against a ruling to dismiss a case on grounds of non-payment of the court fee. Doubts have been raised on the admissibility of payment by a professional attorney within a term of seven days of the service of a court’s decision to dismiss a case. Under Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c. the legislator has allowed for payment of the court fee due within a term of one week from the day on which notice is served on the court’s decision to dismiss the case. The position of the author of this paper is that the term of seven days provided for the remittance of the court fee due in the event of an appeal, as defined in Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c., starts on the day notice is served on the court’s decision to dismiss a case. Any other position on the matter would be in breach of the legal principles at the root of an individual’s right of access to the law and his right to appeal, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, as well as in breach of the prohibition of reformationis in peius. The lodging of an appeal cannot lead to the dismissal of the civil recovery proceedings defined in Art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/801
spellingShingle Grzegorz Jędrejek
TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
Zeszyty Prawnicze
title TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
title_full TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
title_fullStr TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
title_full_unstemmed TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
title_short TERMIN DO UZUPEŁNIENIA NALEŻNEJ OPŁATY PRZEZ PROFESJONALNEGO PEŁNOMOCNIKA W RAZIE WNIESIENIA ZAŻALENIA NA ZARZĄDZENIE O ZWROCIE POZWU
title_sort termin do uzupelnienia naleznej oplaty przez profesjonalnego pelnomocnika w razie wniesienia zazalenia na zarzadzenie o zwrocie pozwu
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/801
work_keys_str_mv AT grzegorzjedrejek termindouzupełnienianaleznejopłatyprzezprofesjonalnegopełnomocnikawraziewniesieniazazalenianazarzadzenieozwrociepozwu