Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population

Abstract Spectacles and contact lenses are important for conducting a normal life in a large part of the general population. The purpose of this study was to estimate the use of these refractive aids in a normal adult population, and to identify characteristics of persons who should be targeted in o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toke Bek, Bodil Hammer Bech, Ivan Nisted
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84045-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559597220888576
author Toke Bek
Bodil Hammer Bech
Ivan Nisted
author_facet Toke Bek
Bodil Hammer Bech
Ivan Nisted
author_sort Toke Bek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Spectacles and contact lenses are important for conducting a normal life in a large part of the general population. The purpose of this study was to estimate the use of these refractive aids in a normal adult population, and to identify characteristics of persons who should be targeted in order to improve uncorrected refraction. In the FORSYN study, 10,350 citizens representative for the adult Danish population were invited for a non-cycloplegic eye examination. The examination was completed in 3,384 persons, and the data were adjusted to represent the frequencies in the originally invited population on the basis of age, sex and socio-economic factors. The frequencies were projected to estimates of absolute numbers in the total adult Danish population. Refractive aids were used by 72.6%, 95% CI: 71.7-73.5% of the adult population. Distance correction was used by 55.7% (95% CI: 54.8-56.7%), contact lenses alone or alternating with spectacles by 11.2% (95% CI: 10.6-11.8%) and reading glasses by 18.8% (95% CI: 18.0-19.5%). Uncorrected refractive error resulted in a reduction in distance visual acuity of 2.99 ETDRS letters per diopter of hyperopia and of 10.3 ETDRS letters per diopter myopia (p < 0.0001 for both regressions). Uncorrected refractive error reduced distance visual acuity significantly in persons using single vision spectacle lenses and progressive addition spectacle lenses that had been prescribed more than 3 years previously. Refractive aids were used in approximately 72% of the population and should be checked when more than 3 years have passed since the last visit with a dispensing optometrist.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d25047d33194e6199e9fd28dd87d6d5
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-5d25047d33194e6199e9fd28dd87d6d52025-01-05T12:21:19ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-011511810.1038/s41598-024-84045-4Use of refractive aids among adults in a general populationToke Bek0Bodil Hammer Bech1Ivan Nisted2Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Spectacles and contact lenses are important for conducting a normal life in a large part of the general population. The purpose of this study was to estimate the use of these refractive aids in a normal adult population, and to identify characteristics of persons who should be targeted in order to improve uncorrected refraction. In the FORSYN study, 10,350 citizens representative for the adult Danish population were invited for a non-cycloplegic eye examination. The examination was completed in 3,384 persons, and the data were adjusted to represent the frequencies in the originally invited population on the basis of age, sex and socio-economic factors. The frequencies were projected to estimates of absolute numbers in the total adult Danish population. Refractive aids were used by 72.6%, 95% CI: 71.7-73.5% of the adult population. Distance correction was used by 55.7% (95% CI: 54.8-56.7%), contact lenses alone or alternating with spectacles by 11.2% (95% CI: 10.6-11.8%) and reading glasses by 18.8% (95% CI: 18.0-19.5%). Uncorrected refractive error resulted in a reduction in distance visual acuity of 2.99 ETDRS letters per diopter of hyperopia and of 10.3 ETDRS letters per diopter myopia (p < 0.0001 for both regressions). Uncorrected refractive error reduced distance visual acuity significantly in persons using single vision spectacle lenses and progressive addition spectacle lenses that had been prescribed more than 3 years previously. Refractive aids were used in approximately 72% of the population and should be checked when more than 3 years have passed since the last visit with a dispensing optometrist.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84045-4Refractive aidsPopulation studyHabitual correctionAutorefractionSubjective refraction.
spellingShingle Toke Bek
Bodil Hammer Bech
Ivan Nisted
Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
Scientific Reports
Refractive aids
Population study
Habitual correction
Autorefraction
Subjective refraction.
title Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
title_full Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
title_fullStr Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
title_full_unstemmed Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
title_short Use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
title_sort use of refractive aids among adults in a general population
topic Refractive aids
Population study
Habitual correction
Autorefraction
Subjective refraction.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84045-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tokebek useofrefractiveaidsamongadultsinageneralpopulation
AT bodilhammerbech useofrefractiveaidsamongadultsinageneralpopulation
AT ivannisted useofrefractiveaidsamongadultsinageneralpopulation