Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?

The taxi services market has relied on platforms for many years.  Taxis can be hailed at the kerb or by using taxi ranks. Often, consumers rely on intermediaries, such as taxi phone lines. The task of these intermediaries is to despatch a call to a driver, so that the latter can meet consumers’ dem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arianna Andreangeli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Editora 2020-10-01
Series:Market and Competition Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/9523
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563913202696192
author Arianna Andreangeli
author_facet Arianna Andreangeli
author_sort Arianna Andreangeli
collection DOAJ
description The taxi services market has relied on platforms for many years.  Taxis can be hailed at the kerb or by using taxi ranks. Often, consumers rely on intermediaries, such as taxi phone lines. The task of these intermediaries is to despatch a call to a driver, so that the latter can meet consumers’ demand in each case. Today, the use of phone apps reliant on geolocalisation software is among the most common ways in which calls are despatched to taxi service providers.  Apps come with significant benefits for both parties.  Consumers can track the car they reserved, whereas drivers can deploy more efficiently their working time since they can locate and respond to calls from customers in areas that are within their reach. The entry into the market for taxi despatch services of these novel instruments has not been without consequences, however.  Are we witnessing a sea change in the way in which traditional platforms in this market have conducted their business so far? What are the competition law implications of the entry of phone apps in the taxi despatch services’ market? How far is the application of the competition rules going to affect the nature of taxi despatch platforms? What are the implications of these decisions for the functioning of other platform-based markets? This paper analyses this question by relying on the practice of national authorities who, in a number of contexts, have ruled on the legality of taxi platforms.  It will be argued that the emergence of platform despatchers using geolocalisation technologies may not only “disrupt” those business models that have characterised the taxi despatching market so far.  It could also lead to a change in the approach that competition law has adopted in relation to other two-sided markets where intermediation is key to the matching of demand and supply, perhaps by spelling the end of “closed” platforms in favour of open models of intermediation. The paper will conclude with some more general reflections on the application of the EU competition rules to two-sided markets.  It will be submitted that, due to the focus placed on the need to avoid the foreclosure of the market in favour of and by existing incumbents, the ability for users to enter and exit from a platform and, more generally, to rely on a variety of channels for service intermediation are going to be essential to maintain the openness and competitiveness of these markets.
format Article
id doaj-art-5b9ad92f2aa0448e922f103777dda04b
institution Kabale University
issn 2184-0008
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Universidade Católica Editora
record_format Article
series Market and Competition Law Review
spelling doaj-art-5b9ad92f2aa0448e922f103777dda04b2025-01-02T23:23:26ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082020-10-014210.34632/mclawreview.2020.9523Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?Arianna Andreangeli0University of Edinburgh, Edingburgh Law School The taxi services market has relied on platforms for many years.  Taxis can be hailed at the kerb or by using taxi ranks. Often, consumers rely on intermediaries, such as taxi phone lines. The task of these intermediaries is to despatch a call to a driver, so that the latter can meet consumers’ demand in each case. Today, the use of phone apps reliant on geolocalisation software is among the most common ways in which calls are despatched to taxi service providers.  Apps come with significant benefits for both parties.  Consumers can track the car they reserved, whereas drivers can deploy more efficiently their working time since they can locate and respond to calls from customers in areas that are within their reach. The entry into the market for taxi despatch services of these novel instruments has not been without consequences, however.  Are we witnessing a sea change in the way in which traditional platforms in this market have conducted their business so far? What are the competition law implications of the entry of phone apps in the taxi despatch services’ market? How far is the application of the competition rules going to affect the nature of taxi despatch platforms? What are the implications of these decisions for the functioning of other platform-based markets? This paper analyses this question by relying on the practice of national authorities who, in a number of contexts, have ruled on the legality of taxi platforms.  It will be argued that the emergence of platform despatchers using geolocalisation technologies may not only “disrupt” those business models that have characterised the taxi despatching market so far.  It could also lead to a change in the approach that competition law has adopted in relation to other two-sided markets where intermediation is key to the matching of demand and supply, perhaps by spelling the end of “closed” platforms in favour of open models of intermediation. The paper will conclude with some more general reflections on the application of the EU competition rules to two-sided markets.  It will be submitted that, due to the focus placed on the need to avoid the foreclosure of the market in favour of and by existing incumbents, the ability for users to enter and exit from a platform and, more generally, to rely on a variety of channels for service intermediation are going to be essential to maintain the openness and competitiveness of these markets. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/9523CompetitionPlatformsTaxi servicesItalyNational competition authorities
spellingShingle Arianna Andreangeli
Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
Market and Competition Law Review
Competition
Platforms
Taxi services
Italy
National competition authorities
title Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
title_full Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
title_fullStr Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
title_full_unstemmed Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
title_short Taxi services, platforms and Article 101 TFEU: changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry?
title_sort taxi services platforms and article 101 tfeu changing the shape of the transport intermediation services industry
topic Competition
Platforms
Taxi services
Italy
National competition authorities
url https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/9523
work_keys_str_mv AT ariannaandreangeli taxiservicesplatformsandarticle101tfeuchangingtheshapeofthetransportintermediationservicesindustry