Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging
Abstract Background This study evaluates the performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) insert combined with a 9.4 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system using three different radiofrequency (RF) coils. The impact of the RF coils within the PET field of view (FoV) on key PET performan...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | EJNMMI Physics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00771-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849334413753581568 |
|---|---|
| author | Claudia Kuntner Joachim Friske Andrea Stessl Martin Haas Lara Luna Breyer Thomas Wanek Marcus Hacker Thomas Helbich Ivo Rausch |
| author_facet | Claudia Kuntner Joachim Friske Andrea Stessl Martin Haas Lara Luna Breyer Thomas Wanek Marcus Hacker Thomas Helbich Ivo Rausch |
| author_sort | Claudia Kuntner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background This study evaluates the performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) insert combined with a 9.4 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system using three different radiofrequency (RF) coils. The impact of the RF coils within the PET field of view (FoV) on key PET performance parameters was carefully examined. Additionally, the accuracy of MR-based attenuation correction (AC) on the quantitative PET results was assessed. Procedures The performance of the PET scanner was assessed according to the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards, focusing on sensitivity, spatial resolution, noise-equivalent count (NEC) rate, and image quality metrics (homogeneity, spillover ratios, and recovery coefficients). These evaluations were conducted with three different RF coils within the PET FoV: a mouse-dedicated coil, a rat-dedicated coil (not optimized for PET), and a big-rat-dedicated coil. Quantitative testing of AC accuracy was also performed using homogeneously filled phantoms of varying sizes and activity levels, comparing images reconstructed with and without AC. Results The peak absolute sensitivity varied depending on the RF coil used, though spatial resolution was unaffected by the presence of the coils. The NEC curve for the mouse phantom peaked at 441.2 kcps at 29.3 MBq with the mouse-dedicated coil. For the rat phantom, NEC was only tested with the rat-dedicated coils, and the NEC peak reached 203.1 kcps at 27.5 MBq with the big-rat-dedicated coil. Activity concentrations in the NEMA image quality phantom were underestimated when standard MR-AC was applied, likely due to the absence of phantom walls in the generated µ-maps. However, for uniformly filled phantoms with wall thicknesses under 1 mm, standard MR-AC provided accurate quantification. Conclusions Overall, the presence of RF coils had only a minor effect on the performance of the PET/MR insert, with the most significant variation observed for the non-PET-optimized coil. Attenuation correction based on generated µ-maps performed well for phantoms with minimal wall thickness. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-58c9a9cd122a415b8be9f46dac3b05a5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2197-7364 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EJNMMI Physics |
| spelling | doaj-art-58c9a9cd122a415b8be9f46dac3b05a52025-08-20T03:45:35ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Physics2197-73642025-07-0112111710.1186/s40658-025-00771-2Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imagingClaudia Kuntner0Joachim Friske1Andrea Stessl2Martin Haas3Lara Luna Breyer4Thomas Wanek5Marcus Hacker6Thomas Helbich7Ivo Rausch8Preclinical Imaging Lab (PIL), Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of ViennaPreclinical Imaging Lab (PIL), Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of ViennaUniversity of Applied ScienceBruker BioSpin Preclinical Imaging Division, Imaging SoftwarePreclinical Imaging Lab (PIL), Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of ViennaPreclinical Imaging Lab (PIL), Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of ViennaResearch Platform Medical Imaging (RPMI), Medical University of ViennaResearch Platform Medical Imaging (RPMI), Medical University of ViennaResearch Platform Medical Imaging (RPMI), Medical University of ViennaAbstract Background This study evaluates the performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) insert combined with a 9.4 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system using three different radiofrequency (RF) coils. The impact of the RF coils within the PET field of view (FoV) on key PET performance parameters was carefully examined. Additionally, the accuracy of MR-based attenuation correction (AC) on the quantitative PET results was assessed. Procedures The performance of the PET scanner was assessed according to the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards, focusing on sensitivity, spatial resolution, noise-equivalent count (NEC) rate, and image quality metrics (homogeneity, spillover ratios, and recovery coefficients). These evaluations were conducted with three different RF coils within the PET FoV: a mouse-dedicated coil, a rat-dedicated coil (not optimized for PET), and a big-rat-dedicated coil. Quantitative testing of AC accuracy was also performed using homogeneously filled phantoms of varying sizes and activity levels, comparing images reconstructed with and without AC. Results The peak absolute sensitivity varied depending on the RF coil used, though spatial resolution was unaffected by the presence of the coils. The NEC curve for the mouse phantom peaked at 441.2 kcps at 29.3 MBq with the mouse-dedicated coil. For the rat phantom, NEC was only tested with the rat-dedicated coils, and the NEC peak reached 203.1 kcps at 27.5 MBq with the big-rat-dedicated coil. Activity concentrations in the NEMA image quality phantom were underestimated when standard MR-AC was applied, likely due to the absence of phantom walls in the generated µ-maps. However, for uniformly filled phantoms with wall thicknesses under 1 mm, standard MR-AC provided accurate quantification. Conclusions Overall, the presence of RF coils had only a minor effect on the performance of the PET/MR insert, with the most significant variation observed for the non-PET-optimized coil. Attenuation correction based on generated µ-maps performed well for phantoms with minimal wall thickness.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00771-2PETPerformanceNEMAQuantitationPET/MRAttenuation |
| spellingShingle | Claudia Kuntner Joachim Friske Andrea Stessl Martin Haas Lara Luna Breyer Thomas Wanek Marcus Hacker Thomas Helbich Ivo Rausch Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging EJNMMI Physics PET Performance NEMA Quantitation PET/MR Attenuation |
| title | Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| title_full | Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| title_fullStr | Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| title_short | Assessing PET performance, image quality, and attenuation correction in the presence of RF coils within a 9.4 T MRI for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| title_sort | assessing pet performance image quality and attenuation correction in the presence of rf coils within a 9 4 t mri for preclinical simultaneous imaging |
| topic | PET Performance NEMA Quantitation PET/MR Attenuation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00771-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT claudiakuntner assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT joachimfriske assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT andreastessl assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT martinhaas assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT laralunabreyer assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT thomaswanek assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT marcushacker assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT thomashelbich assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging AT ivorausch assessingpetperformanceimagequalityandattenuationcorrectioninthepresenceofrfcoilswithina94tmriforpreclinicalsimultaneousimaging |