Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France

A pietra dura table manufactured at the royal Gobelins workshops (Paris) in 1684 will serve as a case study for considering the historical dimensions of borders and how they take particular aesthetic forms. The table pictures a map of France, made out of a mosaic of differently colored pieces of ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sasha Rossman
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University Press 2024-12-01
Series:Artium Quaestiones
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/aq/article/view/45703
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846098848974372864
author Sasha Rossman
author_facet Sasha Rossman
author_sort Sasha Rossman
collection DOAJ
description A pietra dura table manufactured at the royal Gobelins workshops (Paris) in 1684 will serve as a case study for considering the historical dimensions of borders and how they take particular aesthetic forms. The table pictures a map of France, made out of a mosaic of differently colored pieces of marble. The map is traversed by representations of boundaries, between provinces and states as well as a five-part bounded frame that encircles the map. In this object, borders appear as both a lens through which one can learn about the world and control it, while simultaneously presenting boundaries as an embedded part of the material world: a delimited France as a figure that is also a (stone) ground. Considered in its historical dimension, however, the term “border” is insufficient for explaining the types of changes (political, scientific, and cultural) that produced this object. Indeed, during this period, the nature and vocabulary of borders was developing in new ways, just as the image of the state was slowly transitioning from a subject-based (monarchical) to a territorial-based concept of statehood. I argue that by examining the materiality of this particular table, as well as comparing it to other products of material culture from the period (including cartographic atlases and pedagogical lessons), we can recall how borders signified and assumed a particular form at a given historical moment. I propose that, in this context, borders took on specific visual and material forms that aimed to facilitate a kind of collaborative practice of understanding the world, and one’s place in it, in terms of bounded perimeters. The aim of reproducing this historical moment in border production is to encourage us to examine the historical determinants of borders today, both in their epistemological and aesthetic dimensions.
format Article
id doaj-art-57e4fe961cd44e488fe6b68b4e3a35d4
institution Kabale University
issn 0239-202X
2719-4558
language deu
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University Press
record_format Article
series Artium Quaestiones
spelling doaj-art-57e4fe961cd44e488fe6b68b4e3a35d42025-01-01T08:30:15ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz University PressArtium Quaestiones0239-202X2719-45582024-12-013510.14746/aq.2024.35.5Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century FranceSasha Rossmanhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-7171-0005 A pietra dura table manufactured at the royal Gobelins workshops (Paris) in 1684 will serve as a case study for considering the historical dimensions of borders and how they take particular aesthetic forms. The table pictures a map of France, made out of a mosaic of differently colored pieces of marble. The map is traversed by representations of boundaries, between provinces and states as well as a five-part bounded frame that encircles the map. In this object, borders appear as both a lens through which one can learn about the world and control it, while simultaneously presenting boundaries as an embedded part of the material world: a delimited France as a figure that is also a (stone) ground. Considered in its historical dimension, however, the term “border” is insufficient for explaining the types of changes (political, scientific, and cultural) that produced this object. Indeed, during this period, the nature and vocabulary of borders was developing in new ways, just as the image of the state was slowly transitioning from a subject-based (monarchical) to a territorial-based concept of statehood. I argue that by examining the materiality of this particular table, as well as comparing it to other products of material culture from the period (including cartographic atlases and pedagogical lessons), we can recall how borders signified and assumed a particular form at a given historical moment. I propose that, in this context, borders took on specific visual and material forms that aimed to facilitate a kind of collaborative practice of understanding the world, and one’s place in it, in terms of bounded perimeters. The aim of reproducing this historical moment in border production is to encourage us to examine the historical determinants of borders today, both in their epistemological and aesthetic dimensions. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/aq/article/view/45703border studiesdecorative artsearly modern FranceVersaillesMarblePietra Dura
spellingShingle Sasha Rossman
Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
Artium Quaestiones
border studies
decorative arts
early modern France
Versailles
Marble
Pietra Dura
title Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
title_full Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
title_fullStr Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
title_full_unstemmed Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
title_short Materializing Borders and Learning to Think in Limits in 17th-century France
title_sort materializing borders and learning to think in limits in 17th century france
topic border studies
decorative arts
early modern France
Versailles
Marble
Pietra Dura
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/aq/article/view/45703
work_keys_str_mv AT sasharossman materializingbordersandlearningtothinkinlimitsin17thcenturyfrance