Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice
It can be claimed that the subject of justice is the basis and the source of different theories as well as affairs management in the arena of human social life. Social science theorists cannot escape from resorting to a concept and theory of justice in order to prove or justify their theory in any...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2017-07-01
|
Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2690_1a4343e2981d18534280a325ebee2abb.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841543753521692672 |
---|---|
author | Mohammad Nemati |
author_facet | Mohammad Nemati |
author_sort | Mohammad Nemati |
collection | DOAJ |
description | It can be claimed that the subject of justice is the basis and the source of different theories as well as affairs management in the arena of human social life. Social science theorists cannot escape from resorting to a concept and theory of justice in order to prove or justify their theory in any of these sciences. In the analysis of each theory of justice, three factors are considered: • First, the basis of justice: what does the theory think about the basis of justice? The answer to this question also identifies the methodology of the theorist of justice in explaining his or her conception of justice.• Second, the scope of justice: What is the scope and area in which the theory of justice is offered?• Third, the definition of justice: What does the concept of justice represent?Rawls, in the Theory of Justice, has tried to answer all three questions, and the same integrity makes Rawls' theory of justice, among remarkable ideas of justice in recent decades. In this paper, while introducing the general structure of the book and a brief reconstruction of his theory, criticisms of the book, with emphasis on two factors - the scope and the definition of justice - in Rawls theory, are discussed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-56dbcfd077bf4092b515d23ed7b56f72 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2383-1650 |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2017-07-01 |
publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
record_format | Article |
series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
spelling | doaj-art-56dbcfd077bf4092b515d23ed7b56f722025-01-13T05:34:02ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502017-07-011731351522690Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of JusticeMohammad Nemati0Assistant Professor of Economics in Islamic Studies & Economics Faculty Imam Sadiq UniversityIt can be claimed that the subject of justice is the basis and the source of different theories as well as affairs management in the arena of human social life. Social science theorists cannot escape from resorting to a concept and theory of justice in order to prove or justify their theory in any of these sciences. In the analysis of each theory of justice, three factors are considered: • First, the basis of justice: what does the theory think about the basis of justice? The answer to this question also identifies the methodology of the theorist of justice in explaining his or her conception of justice.• Second, the scope of justice: What is the scope and area in which the theory of justice is offered?• Third, the definition of justice: What does the concept of justice represent?Rawls, in the Theory of Justice, has tried to answer all three questions, and the same integrity makes Rawls' theory of justice, among remarkable ideas of justice in recent decades. In this paper, while introducing the general structure of the book and a brief reconstruction of his theory, criticisms of the book, with emphasis on two factors - the scope and the definition of justice - in Rawls theory, are discussed.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2690_1a4343e2981d18534280a325ebee2abb.pdfthe theory of justicejohn rawlsthe principle of differencethe veil of ignoranceoriginal positionthe reflective equilibrium |
spellingShingle | Mohammad Nemati Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی the theory of justice john rawls the principle of difference the veil of ignorance original position the reflective equilibrium |
title | Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice |
title_full | Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice |
title_fullStr | Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice |
title_short | Critical Review of John Rawls's Theory of Justice with Emphasis on the Scope and Definition of Justice |
title_sort | critical review of john rawls s theory of justice with emphasis on the scope and definition of justice |
topic | the theory of justice john rawls the principle of difference the veil of ignorance original position the reflective equilibrium |
url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2690_1a4343e2981d18534280a325ebee2abb.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadnemati criticalreviewofjohnrawlsstheoryofjusticewithemphasisonthescopeanddefinitionofjustice |