Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality

This paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of cognitive contextuality inspired by quantum contextuality research. This contextuality is related to, but not identical to context-sensitivity which is well-studied in cognitive psychology and decision making. This paper is a part of quantum-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Likan Zhan, Andrei Khrennikov, Yingce Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/11/950
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846153583442001920
author Likan Zhan
Andrei Khrennikov
Yingce Zhu
author_facet Likan Zhan
Andrei Khrennikov
Yingce Zhu
author_sort Likan Zhan
collection DOAJ
description This paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of cognitive contextuality inspired by quantum contextuality research. This contextuality is related to, but not identical to context-sensitivity which is well-studied in cognitive psychology and decision making. This paper is a part of quantum-like modeling, i.e., exploring the methodology of quantum theory outside of physics. We examined the bistable perception of cup-like objects, which strongly depends on experimental contexts. Our experimental data confirmed the existence of cognitive hysteresis, the important role of memory, and the non-commutative structure of cognitive observables. In physics, quantum contextuality is assessed using Bell-CHSH inequalities, and their violation is incorrectly believed to imply the nonlocality of Nature. The violation of Bell-type inequalities in cognitive and social science strongly indicates that the metaphysical implications of these inequalities are quite limited. In our experiments, modified Leggett–Garg inequalities were also significantly violated, but this only means that experimental data from experiments performed in different contexts cannot be modeled by a unique set of noncontextual, jointly distributed random variables. In our experiments, we know the empirical probability distributions measured in different contexts; thus, we can obtain much more detailed and reliable information about contextuality in human cognition by performing nonparametric compatibility tests.
format Article
id doaj-art-5676eee5e0dd4d348884a7349aeccc88
institution Kabale University
issn 1099-4300
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj-art-5676eee5e0dd4d348884a7349aeccc882024-11-26T18:03:11ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002024-11-01261195010.3390/e26110950Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive ContextualityLikan Zhan0Andrei Khrennikov1Yingce Zhu2School of Communication Science, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, ChinaInternational Center for Mathematical Modeling in Physics and Cognitive Sciences, Linnaeus University, 35195 Växjö, SwedenSchool of Communication Science, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, ChinaThis paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of cognitive contextuality inspired by quantum contextuality research. This contextuality is related to, but not identical to context-sensitivity which is well-studied in cognitive psychology and decision making. This paper is a part of quantum-like modeling, i.e., exploring the methodology of quantum theory outside of physics. We examined the bistable perception of cup-like objects, which strongly depends on experimental contexts. Our experimental data confirmed the existence of cognitive hysteresis, the important role of memory, and the non-commutative structure of cognitive observables. In physics, quantum contextuality is assessed using Bell-CHSH inequalities, and their violation is incorrectly believed to imply the nonlocality of Nature. The violation of Bell-type inequalities in cognitive and social science strongly indicates that the metaphysical implications of these inequalities are quite limited. In our experiments, modified Leggett–Garg inequalities were also significantly violated, but this only means that experimental data from experiments performed in different contexts cannot be modeled by a unique set of noncontextual, jointly distributed random variables. In our experiments, we know the empirical probability distributions measured in different contexts; thus, we can obtain much more detailed and reliable information about contextuality in human cognition by performing nonparametric compatibility tests.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/11/950quantum-like modelingLeggett–Garg inequalityclassical vs. quantum probabilitycontextualityhysteresisprocessing uncertainties
spellingShingle Likan Zhan
Andrei Khrennikov
Yingce Zhu
Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
Entropy
quantum-like modeling
Leggett–Garg inequality
classical vs. quantum probability
contextuality
hysteresis
processing uncertainties
title Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
title_full Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
title_fullStr Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
title_full_unstemmed Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
title_short Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality
title_sort violation of leggett garg inequality in perceiving cup like objects and cognitive contextuality
topic quantum-like modeling
Leggett–Garg inequality
classical vs. quantum probability
contextuality
hysteresis
processing uncertainties
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/11/950
work_keys_str_mv AT likanzhan violationofleggettgarginequalityinperceivingcuplikeobjectsandcognitivecontextuality
AT andreikhrennikov violationofleggettgarginequalityinperceivingcuplikeobjectsandcognitivecontextuality
AT yingcezhu violationofleggettgarginequalityinperceivingcuplikeobjectsandcognitivecontextuality