Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability
Objective: This study aimed to develop a questionnaire as an instrument to evaluate management practices in fitness facilities. Methods: This study uses a mixed-methods approach. The sample for the Aiken V validity test was 7 lecturers and 333 respondents from various fitness facilities, such as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
FEADEF
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/111286 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841558968860672000 |
|---|---|
| author | Inas Gita Amalia Suharjana Suharjana Ahmad Nasrulloh Danny Eka Wahyu Saputra Muhammad Fatih Humam Dewi Kiani Cakrawati |
| author_facet | Inas Gita Amalia Suharjana Suharjana Ahmad Nasrulloh Danny Eka Wahyu Saputra Muhammad Fatih Humam Dewi Kiani Cakrawati |
| author_sort | Inas Gita Amalia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Objective: This study aimed to develop a questionnaire as an instrument to evaluate management practices in fitness facilities.
Methods: This study uses a mixed-methods approach. The sample for the Aiken V validity test was 7 lecturers and 333 respondents from various fitness facilities, such as fitness centers, swimming pools, sports fields, fitness studios, sports arenas, and communities, for the Cronbach's Alpha reliability test, the indicators assessed in this evaluation instrument are 1) Program Background, 2) Program Objectives, 3) Human Resources, 4) Programs, 5) Funding, 6) Infrastructure Facilities, 7) Program Implementation, 8) Coordination, 9) Achievements, 10) Obstacles.
Results: Validity test includes aspects of the suitability of the material with the research objectives, suitability of the material, material sequence procedures, questionnaire design, and the language used showing an Aiken V value of 0.8 - 0.9. Then, the Cronbach's alpha value> 0.7.
Conclusion: Thus, this evaluation instrument showed a valid and reliable value. Future research is expected to further refine the instrument through a larger population sample size and additional testing methods, such as test-retest, to improve its validity and reliability.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-55aca798d827461ead5df1488ceb3127 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1579-1726 1988-2041 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | FEADEF |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación |
| spelling | doaj-art-55aca798d827461ead5df1488ceb31272025-01-05T17:10:48ZengFEADEFRetos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación1579-17261988-20412025-01-016310.47197/retos.v63.111286Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliabilityInas Gita Amalia0Suharjana Suharjana1Ahmad Nasrulloh2Danny Eka Wahyu Saputra3Muhammad Fatih Humam4Dewi Kiani Cakrawati5Yogyakarta State University, IndonesiaYogyakarta State University, IndonesiaYogyakarta State University, IndonesiaYogyakarta State University, IndonesiaYogyakarta State University, IndonesiaYogyakarta State University, Indonesia Objective: This study aimed to develop a questionnaire as an instrument to evaluate management practices in fitness facilities. Methods: This study uses a mixed-methods approach. The sample for the Aiken V validity test was 7 lecturers and 333 respondents from various fitness facilities, such as fitness centers, swimming pools, sports fields, fitness studios, sports arenas, and communities, for the Cronbach's Alpha reliability test, the indicators assessed in this evaluation instrument are 1) Program Background, 2) Program Objectives, 3) Human Resources, 4) Programs, 5) Funding, 6) Infrastructure Facilities, 7) Program Implementation, 8) Coordination, 9) Achievements, 10) Obstacles. Results: Validity test includes aspects of the suitability of the material with the research objectives, suitability of the material, material sequence procedures, questionnaire design, and the language used showing an Aiken V value of 0.8 - 0.9. Then, the Cronbach's alpha value> 0.7. Conclusion: Thus, this evaluation instrument showed a valid and reliable value. Future research is expected to further refine the instrument through a larger population sample size and additional testing methods, such as test-retest, to improve its validity and reliability. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/111286sport evaluationsport managementfitness facilitiesmeasurement innovation |
| spellingShingle | Inas Gita Amalia Suharjana Suharjana Ahmad Nasrulloh Danny Eka Wahyu Saputra Muhammad Fatih Humam Dewi Kiani Cakrawati Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación sport evaluation sport management fitness facilities measurement innovation |
| title | Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability |
| title_full | Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability |
| title_fullStr | Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability |
| title_full_unstemmed | Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability |
| title_short | Innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument: validity and reliability |
| title_sort | innovation and development of fitness facility management evaluation instrument validity and reliability |
| topic | sport evaluation sport management fitness facilities measurement innovation |
| url | https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/111286 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT inasgitaamalia innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability AT suharjanasuharjana innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability AT ahmadnasrulloh innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability AT dannyekawahyusaputra innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability AT muhammadfatihhumam innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability AT dewikianicakrawati innovationanddevelopmentoffitnessfacilitymanagementevaluationinstrumentvalidityandreliability |