Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450)
Abstract Following the submission of dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer Agriculture BV, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the re...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | EFSA Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8489 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846169045747892224 |
|---|---|
| author | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Ewen Mullins Jean‐Louis Bresson Tamas Dalmay Ian Crawford Dewhurst Michelle M. Epstein Leslie George Firbank Philippe Guerche Jan Hejatko Francisco Javier Moreno Hanspeter Naegeli Fabien Nogué Nils Rostoks Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano Giovanni Savoini Eve Veromann Fabio Veronesi Ana M. Camargo Tilemachos Goumperis Paolo Lenzi Pietro Piffanelli Tommaso Raffaello |
| author_facet | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Ewen Mullins Jean‐Louis Bresson Tamas Dalmay Ian Crawford Dewhurst Michelle M. Epstein Leslie George Firbank Philippe Guerche Jan Hejatko Francisco Javier Moreno Hanspeter Naegeli Fabien Nogué Nils Rostoks Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano Giovanni Savoini Eve Veromann Fabio Veronesi Ana M. Camargo Tilemachos Goumperis Paolo Lenzi Pietro Piffanelli Tommaso Raffaello |
| author_sort | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Following the submission of dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer Agriculture BV, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the insect protected genetically modified maize MON 810, for food and feed uses (including pollen), excluding cultivation within the European Union. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, an evaluation of the literature retrieved by a scoping review, additional studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant and updated bioinformatics analyses. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in maize MON 810 considered for renewal is identical to the sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize MON 810. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-53cb1c82c23a4595b07d42e64bcffbaf |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1831-4732 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EFSA Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-53cb1c82c23a4595b07d42e64bcffbaf2024-11-13T07:31:25ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322024-01-01221n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8489Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450)EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Ewen MullinsJean‐Louis BressonTamas DalmayIan Crawford DewhurstMichelle M. EpsteinLeslie George FirbankPhilippe GuercheJan HejatkoFrancisco Javier MorenoHanspeter NaegeliFabien NoguéNils RostoksJose Juan Sánchez SerranoGiovanni SavoiniEve VeromannFabio VeronesiAna M. CamargoTilemachos GoumperisPaolo LenziPietro PiffanelliTommaso RaffaelloAbstract Following the submission of dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer Agriculture BV, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the insect protected genetically modified maize MON 810, for food and feed uses (including pollen), excluding cultivation within the European Union. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, an evaluation of the literature retrieved by a scoping review, additional studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant and updated bioinformatics analyses. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in maize MON 810 considered for renewal is identical to the sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize MON 810.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8489Articles 11 and 23maizeMON 810Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003renewal |
| spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Ewen Mullins Jean‐Louis Bresson Tamas Dalmay Ian Crawford Dewhurst Michelle M. Epstein Leslie George Firbank Philippe Guerche Jan Hejatko Francisco Javier Moreno Hanspeter Naegeli Fabien Nogué Nils Rostoks Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano Giovanni Savoini Eve Veromann Fabio Veronesi Ana M. Camargo Tilemachos Goumperis Paolo Lenzi Pietro Piffanelli Tommaso Raffaello Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) EFSA Journal Articles 11 and 23 maize MON 810 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 renewal |
| title | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) |
| title_full | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) |
| title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) |
| title_short | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 810 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (dossier GMFF‐2022‐9450) |
| title_sort | assessment of genetically modified maize mon 810 for renewal authorisation under regulation ec no 1829 2003 dossier gmff 2022 9450 |
| topic | Articles 11 and 23 maize MON 810 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 renewal |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8489 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsgmo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT ewenmullins assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT jeanlouisbresson assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT tamasdalmay assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT iancrawforddewhurst assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT michellemepstein assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT lesliegeorgefirbank assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT philippeguerche assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT janhejatko assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT franciscojaviermoreno assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT hanspeternaegeli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT fabiennogue assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT nilsrostoks assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT josejuansanchezserrano assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT giovannisavoini assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT eveveromann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT fabioveronesi assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT anamcamargo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT tilemachosgoumperis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT paololenzi assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT pietropiffanelli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 AT tommasoraffaello assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003dossiergmff20229450 |