Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs

Abstract A broad consensus of neutralizing the carbon dioxide emissions facilitates the transition to the renewable energy power system. Meanwhile, the concerns about the volatility of renewable energies are growing as the rotational inertia of power system becomes inadequate. To maintain the freque...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naixuan Zhu, Pengfei Hu, Chongxi Jiang, Yanxue Yu, Daozhuo Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:IET Renewable Power Generation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13085
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841546504930590720
author Naixuan Zhu
Pengfei Hu
Chongxi Jiang
Yanxue Yu
Daozhuo Jiang
author_facet Naixuan Zhu
Pengfei Hu
Chongxi Jiang
Yanxue Yu
Daozhuo Jiang
author_sort Naixuan Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A broad consensus of neutralizing the carbon dioxide emissions facilitates the transition to the renewable energy power system. Meanwhile, the concerns about the volatility of renewable energies are growing as the rotational inertia of power system becomes inadequate. To maintain the frequency stability of power system, some studies for configuring inertia energy storage systems (ESSs) are carried out, mainly focusing on the allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming ESS. In contrast, the allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐following ESS has not been well elaborated and the differences in virtual inertia provided by these two modes are yet to be revealed. Based on H2‐norm and Kron reduction, firstly, the state‐space model of post‐disturbance system is established, together with the transient performance evaluation. Then the inertia characteristics of both grid‐forming and grid‐following devices are formulated, followed by the unified gradient descent optimization method for allocating virtual inertia. A modified IEEE 39‐bus system and its time‐domain simulations help in the verification of the contribution of this paper. Through the comparative analysis of corresponding optimal results, the conclusions from two aspects are drawn: in terms of transient frequency support, the grid‐forming devices can provide no less than 26% better inertia support; with the higher power capacity and similar energy capacity, the grid‐forming devices can relieve the response pressure of other generators by approximately 77.1%.
format Article
id doaj-art-53c91a7d006d4342b471c12ab48b5ddd
institution Kabale University
issn 1752-1416
1752-1424
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Renewable Power Generation
spelling doaj-art-53c91a7d006d4342b471c12ab48b5ddd2025-01-10T17:41:03ZengWileyIET Renewable Power Generation1752-14161752-14242024-10-0118142416242910.1049/rpg2.13085Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSsNaixuan Zhu0Pengfei Hu1Chongxi Jiang2Yanxue Yu3Daozhuo Jiang4College of Electrical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou People's Republic of ChinaCollege of Electrical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou People's Republic of ChinaHangzhou Power Supply Company of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co. Ltd. Hangzhou People's Republic of ChinaCollege of Electrical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou People's Republic of ChinaCollege of Electrical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou People's Republic of ChinaAbstract A broad consensus of neutralizing the carbon dioxide emissions facilitates the transition to the renewable energy power system. Meanwhile, the concerns about the volatility of renewable energies are growing as the rotational inertia of power system becomes inadequate. To maintain the frequency stability of power system, some studies for configuring inertia energy storage systems (ESSs) are carried out, mainly focusing on the allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming ESS. In contrast, the allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐following ESS has not been well elaborated and the differences in virtual inertia provided by these two modes are yet to be revealed. Based on H2‐norm and Kron reduction, firstly, the state‐space model of post‐disturbance system is established, together with the transient performance evaluation. Then the inertia characteristics of both grid‐forming and grid‐following devices are formulated, followed by the unified gradient descent optimization method for allocating virtual inertia. A modified IEEE 39‐bus system and its time‐domain simulations help in the verification of the contribution of this paper. Through the comparative analysis of corresponding optimal results, the conclusions from two aspects are drawn: in terms of transient frequency support, the grid‐forming devices can provide no less than 26% better inertia support; with the higher power capacity and similar energy capacity, the grid‐forming devices can relieve the response pressure of other generators by approximately 77.1%.https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13085energy storagefrequency stability
spellingShingle Naixuan Zhu
Pengfei Hu
Chongxi Jiang
Yanxue Yu
Daozhuo Jiang
Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
IET Renewable Power Generation
energy storage
frequency stability
title Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
title_full Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
title_fullStr Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
title_short Comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid‐forming and grid‐following controlled ESSs
title_sort comparative analysis and optimal allocation of virtual inertia from grid forming and grid following controlled esss
topic energy storage
frequency stability
url https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13085
work_keys_str_mv AT naixuanzhu comparativeanalysisandoptimalallocationofvirtualinertiafromgridformingandgridfollowingcontrolledesss
AT pengfeihu comparativeanalysisandoptimalallocationofvirtualinertiafromgridformingandgridfollowingcontrolledesss
AT chongxijiang comparativeanalysisandoptimalallocationofvirtualinertiafromgridformingandgridfollowingcontrolledesss
AT yanxueyu comparativeanalysisandoptimalallocationofvirtualinertiafromgridformingandgridfollowingcontrolledesss
AT daozhuojiang comparativeanalysisandoptimalallocationofvirtualinertiafromgridformingandgridfollowingcontrolledesss