COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION
The aim of this paper is to compare two geodetic methods - GNSS and aerial photogrammetry in the context of calculating the volumes of mineral resources in open-pit mines. The advantages and weaknesses of both methods are analyzed, as well as their impact on accuracy, efficiency, and costs. The resu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Bosnian |
| Published: |
Union of Associations of Geodetic Professionals in Bosnia and Herzegovina
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Geodetski Glasnik |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://glasnik.suggsbih.ba/glasnik/55/documents/GG55_Kesetovic_Isakovic_Catic.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841557283205545984 |
|---|---|
| author | Amela Kešetović Amar Isaković Jasmin Ćatić |
| author_facet | Amela Kešetović Amar Isaković Jasmin Ćatić |
| author_sort | Amela Kešetović |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this paper is to compare two geodetic methods - GNSS and aerial photogrammetry in the context of calculating the volumes of mineral resources in open-pit mines. The advantages and weaknesses of both methods are analyzed, as well as their impact on accuracy, efficiency, and costs. The results show that the GNSS method provides high accuracy on simpler and flatter terrains but demonstrates weaknesses on more complex terrains due to the approximation of the actual surface using breakpoints obtained by the GNSS method. The aerial photogrammetry method enables fast and efficient data collection and provides a detailed 3D model, making it particularly useful in hard-to-access or hazardous areas. Additionally, it significantly saves time during data collection and reduces the demand for geodetic professionals. The paper also compares volume calculation methods, emphasizing how technological advancements allow many software solutions to treat the 3D model of the subject area as a whole rather than as segments such as profiles, prisms, etc. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-53ac95f36fae49a089170792f0f2bb8d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1512-6102 2233-1786 |
| language | Bosnian |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Union of Associations of Geodetic Professionals in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geodetski Glasnik |
| spelling | doaj-art-53ac95f36fae49a089170792f0f2bb8d2025-01-06T14:16:30ZbosUnion of Associations of Geodetic Professionals in Bosnia and HerzegovinaGeodetski Glasnik1512-61022233-17862024-12-0155108120https://doi.org/10.58817/2233-1786.2024.58.55.108COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATIONAmela Kešetović0Amar Isaković1Jasmin Ćatić2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-9915Rudarsko projektovanje d.o.o. TuzlaENCOS d.o.o. SarajevoFederalna uprava za geodetske i imovinsko-pravne poslove, SarajevoThe aim of this paper is to compare two geodetic methods - GNSS and aerial photogrammetry in the context of calculating the volumes of mineral resources in open-pit mines. The advantages and weaknesses of both methods are analyzed, as well as their impact on accuracy, efficiency, and costs. The results show that the GNSS method provides high accuracy on simpler and flatter terrains but demonstrates weaknesses on more complex terrains due to the approximation of the actual surface using breakpoints obtained by the GNSS method. The aerial photogrammetry method enables fast and efficient data collection and provides a detailed 3D model, making it particularly useful in hard-to-access or hazardous areas. Additionally, it significantly saves time during data collection and reduces the demand for geodetic professionals. The paper also compares volume calculation methods, emphasizing how technological advancements allow many software solutions to treat the 3D model of the subject area as a whole rather than as segments such as profiles, prisms, etc.https://glasnik.suggsbih.ba/glasnik/55/documents/GG55_Kesetovic_Isakovic_Catic.pdfgnssuavvolume calculation photogrammetryquarry |
| spellingShingle | Amela Kešetović Amar Isaković Jasmin Ćatić COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION Geodetski Glasnik gnss uav volume calculation photogrammetry quarry |
| title | COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION |
| title_full | COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION |
| title_fullStr | COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION |
| title_short | COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VOLUMES OF MINERAL RAW MATERIALS DURING SURFACE EXPLOITATION |
| title_sort | comparison of methods for calculating volumes of mineral raw materials during surface exploitation |
| topic | gnss uav volume calculation photogrammetry quarry |
| url | https://glasnik.suggsbih.ba/glasnik/55/documents/GG55_Kesetovic_Isakovic_Catic.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amelakesetovic comparisonofmethodsforcalculatingvolumesofmineralrawmaterialsduringsurfaceexploitation AT amarisakovic comparisonofmethodsforcalculatingvolumesofmineralrawmaterialsduringsurfaceexploitation AT jasmincatic comparisonofmethodsforcalculatingvolumesofmineralrawmaterialsduringsurfaceexploitation |