Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region

In this paper,the evaluation index system of water resources carrying capacity was built in terms of three dimensions of water resources carrying subject,carrying object,and approach.TOPSIS model,coupling coordination model,and production function model were used to analyze the water resources carry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JIN Zhanwei, SUN Bo, LIU Hechang
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Pearl River 2023-01-01
Series:Renmin Zhujiang
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2023.12.013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841535137709293568
author JIN Zhanwei
SUN Bo
LIU Hechang
author_facet JIN Zhanwei
SUN Bo
LIU Hechang
author_sort JIN Zhanwei
collection DOAJ
description In this paper,the evaluation index system of water resources carrying capacity was built in terms of three dimensions of water resources carrying subject,carrying object,and approach.TOPSIS model,coupling coordination model,and production function model were used to analyze the water resources carrying status of 27 key basins in the Pearl River region.The results show that the water resources carrying capacity of Nandu River,Guijiang River,Wanquan River,and Beijiang River basins rank first,and that of Jiuzhou River,Huangni River,Qinjiang River,and Jianjiang River Basins rank second.The internal elements of the water resources system in the key basins are mainly characterized by near imbalance,with 17 near imbalance basins,nine mild imbalance basins,and one moderate imbalance basins.The water resource carrying efficiency curve of key basins shows three types:low,medium,and high.There are four low-efficiency basins,12 medium-efficiency Basins,and 11 high-efficiency basins.A comprehensive comparison of water resources carrying capacity ranking,coupling coordination degree,and carrying efficiency shows that the water resource carrying capacity of the Jiuzhou River,Jianjiang River,and Qinjiang River Basins is poor,while that of the Beijiang River,Xijiang River,Wushui River,Hejiang River,and Tingjiang River Basins is relatively good.The results in this paper can be an important reference for the planning,development,utilization,protection,and management of water resources in the Pearl River region and key river basins.
format Article
id doaj-art-537c2b16b91a4e68ab7d582cec16c30f
institution Kabale University
issn 1001-9235
language zho
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Editorial Office of Pearl River
record_format Article
series Renmin Zhujiang
spelling doaj-art-537c2b16b91a4e68ab7d582cec16c30f2025-01-15T02:34:45ZzhoEditorial Office of Pearl RiverRenmin Zhujiang1001-92352023-01-014448604000Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River RegionJIN ZhanweiSUN BoLIU HechangIn this paper,the evaluation index system of water resources carrying capacity was built in terms of three dimensions of water resources carrying subject,carrying object,and approach.TOPSIS model,coupling coordination model,and production function model were used to analyze the water resources carrying status of 27 key basins in the Pearl River region.The results show that the water resources carrying capacity of Nandu River,Guijiang River,Wanquan River,and Beijiang River basins rank first,and that of Jiuzhou River,Huangni River,Qinjiang River,and Jianjiang River Basins rank second.The internal elements of the water resources system in the key basins are mainly characterized by near imbalance,with 17 near imbalance basins,nine mild imbalance basins,and one moderate imbalance basins.The water resource carrying efficiency curve of key basins shows three types:low,medium,and high.There are four low-efficiency basins,12 medium-efficiency Basins,and 11 high-efficiency basins.A comprehensive comparison of water resources carrying capacity ranking,coupling coordination degree,and carrying efficiency shows that the water resource carrying capacity of the Jiuzhou River,Jianjiang River,and Qinjiang River Basins is poor,while that of the Beijiang River,Xijiang River,Wushui River,Hejiang River,and Tingjiang River Basins is relatively good.The results in this paper can be an important reference for the planning,development,utilization,protection,and management of water resources in the Pearl River region and key river basins.http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2023.12.013water resources carrying capacityindex systemcoupling coordinationcarrying efficiency
spellingShingle JIN Zhanwei
SUN Bo
LIU Hechang
Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
Renmin Zhujiang
water resources carrying capacity
index system
coupling coordination
carrying efficiency
title Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
title_full Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
title_short Comparative Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Key River Basins in the Pearl River Region
title_sort comparative study on water resources carrying capacity of key river basins in the pearl river region
topic water resources carrying capacity
index system
coupling coordination
carrying efficiency
url http://www.renminzhujiang.cn/thesisDetails#10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2023.12.013
work_keys_str_mv AT jinzhanwei comparativestudyonwaterresourcescarryingcapacityofkeyriverbasinsinthepearlriverregion
AT sunbo comparativestudyonwaterresourcescarryingcapacityofkeyriverbasinsinthepearlriverregion
AT liuhechang comparativestudyonwaterresourcescarryingcapacityofkeyriverbasinsinthepearlriverregion