Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022

Abstract Numerical forecasts of plasma convective instability in the postsunset equatorial ionosphere are made based on data from the Ionospheric Connections Explorer satellite (ICON) following the method outlined in a previous study. Data are selected from pairs of successive orbits. Data from the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. L. Hysell, A. Kirchman, B. J. Harding, R. A. Heelis, S. L. England, H. U. Frey, S. B. Mende
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003817
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536401562140672
author D. L. Hysell
A. Kirchman
B. J. Harding
R. A. Heelis
S. L. England
H. U. Frey
S. B. Mende
author_facet D. L. Hysell
A. Kirchman
B. J. Harding
R. A. Heelis
S. L. England
H. U. Frey
S. B. Mende
author_sort D. L. Hysell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Numerical forecasts of plasma convective instability in the postsunset equatorial ionosphere are made based on data from the Ionospheric Connections Explorer satellite (ICON) following the method outlined in a previous study. Data are selected from pairs of successive orbits. Data from the first orbit in the pair are used to initialize and force a numerical forecast simulation, and data from the second orbit are used to validate the results 104 min later. Data from the IVM plasma density and drifts instrument and the MIGHTI red‐line thermospheric winds instrument are used to force the forecast model. Thirteen (16) data set pairs from August (October), 2022, are considered. Forecasts produced one false negative in August and another false negative in October. Possible causes of forecast discrepancies are evaluated including the failure to initialize the numerical simulations with electron density profiles measured concurrently. Volume emission 135.6‐nm OI profiles from the Far Ultraviolet (FUV) instrument on ICON are considered in the evaluation.
format Article
id doaj-art-531bd82eea694c958b49408424e31610
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-531bd82eea694c958b49408424e316102025-01-14T16:30:30ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-03-01223n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003817Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022D. L. Hysell0A. Kirchman1B. J. Harding2R. A. Heelis3S. L. England4H. U. Frey5S. B. Mende6Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University Ithaca NY USAEarth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University Ithaca NY USASpace Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley Berkeley CA USAWilliam B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas Dallas TX USAAerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg VA USASpace Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley Berkeley CA USASpace Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley Berkeley CA USAAbstract Numerical forecasts of plasma convective instability in the postsunset equatorial ionosphere are made based on data from the Ionospheric Connections Explorer satellite (ICON) following the method outlined in a previous study. Data are selected from pairs of successive orbits. Data from the first orbit in the pair are used to initialize and force a numerical forecast simulation, and data from the second orbit are used to validate the results 104 min later. Data from the IVM plasma density and drifts instrument and the MIGHTI red‐line thermospheric winds instrument are used to force the forecast model. Thirteen (16) data set pairs from August (October), 2022, are considered. Forecasts produced one false negative in August and another false negative in October. Possible causes of forecast discrepancies are evaluated including the failure to initialize the numerical simulations with electron density profiles measured concurrently. Volume emission 135.6‐nm OI profiles from the Far Ultraviolet (FUV) instrument on ICON are considered in the evaluation.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003817space weatherionospheric irregularitiesequatorial ionosphereinterchange instabilityspread Fforecast
spellingShingle D. L. Hysell
A. Kirchman
B. J. Harding
R. A. Heelis
S. L. England
H. U. Frey
S. B. Mende
Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
Space Weather
space weather
ionospheric irregularities
equatorial ionosphere
interchange instability
spread F
forecast
title Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
title_full Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
title_fullStr Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
title_full_unstemmed Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
title_short Using ICON Satellite Data to Forecast Equatorial Ionospheric Instability Throughout 2022
title_sort using icon satellite data to forecast equatorial ionospheric instability throughout 2022
topic space weather
ionospheric irregularities
equatorial ionosphere
interchange instability
spread F
forecast
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003817
work_keys_str_mv AT dlhysell usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT akirchman usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT bjharding usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT raheelis usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT slengland usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT hufrey usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022
AT sbmende usingiconsatellitedatatoforecastequatorialionosphericinstabilitythroughout2022