Enteral micronutrient supplementation and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm or low birth weight infants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract The association of enteral micronutrient supplementation and the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm or low birth weight (LBW) infants is controversial. This research was prospectively registered (CRD42023454034). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, ClinicalTrials. gov, and the Cochra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yakun Liu, Shaobin Jin, Guoqing Zhang, Tingwei Chen, Shungen Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Maternal and Child Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract The association of enteral micronutrient supplementation and the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm or low birth weight (LBW) infants is controversial. This research was prospectively registered (CRD42023454034). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, ClinicalTrials. gov, and the Cochrane Library for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi‐RCTs comparing any enteral micronutrients supplementation with placebo or no supplementation in preterm or LBW infants. The primary outcome was neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), with secondary outcomes involving various neurodevelopmental tests and disabilities. There was no evidence of an association between enteral micronutrients supplementation and the risk of NDI (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93–1.14; moderate certainty evidence). There was no evidence that the supplemented groups enhanced cognitive (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, −0.37 to 1.67; low certainty evidence), language (SMD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.11 to 0.09; moderate certainty evidence), or motor scores (SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.15; very low certainty evidence) or IQ (SMD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.53 to 0.13; very low certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis showed that multiple micronutrients supplementation improved expressive language score (MD, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.39–2.45), and zinc supplementation enhanced fine motor score (SMD, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.98–2.43). The overall heterogeneity was low. This study demonstrates that enteral micronutrient supplementation is associated with little or no benefits in neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm or LBW infants. Well‐designed RCTs are needed to further ascertain these associations.
ISSN:1740-8695
1740-8709