Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sue Crengle, Giorgi Kvizhinadze, Melissa McLeod, Peter Sandiford, Karen Bartholomew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037145.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554032225681408
author Sue Crengle
Giorgi Kvizhinadze
Melissa McLeod
Peter Sandiford
Karen Bartholomew
author_facet Sue Crengle
Giorgi Kvizhinadze
Melissa McLeod
Peter Sandiford
Karen Bartholomew
author_sort Sue Crengle
collection DOAJ
description Objective There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years.Design A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets.Setting New Zealand.Participants Population aged 55–74 years in 2011.Interventions Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care.Outcome measures Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured.Results LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival.Conclusion A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival.
format Article
id doaj-art-50c7b7d66b8444b1a04f04e2009c2ab0
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-50c7b7d66b8444b1a04f04e2009c2ab02025-01-09T03:40:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2020-037145Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysisSue Crengle0Giorgi Kvizhinadze1Melissa McLeod2Peter Sandiford3Karen Bartholomew4Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand1 Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost Effectiveness Programme (BODE 3), University of Otago, Wellington, New ZealandTe Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New ZealandWaitemata District Health Board, Takapuna, New ZealandWaitemata District Health Board, Takapuna, New ZealandObjective There are large inequities in the lung cancer burden for the Indigenous Māori population of New Zealand. We model the potential lifetime health gains, equity impacts and cost-effectiveness of a national low-dose CT (LDCT) screening programme for lung cancer in smokers aged 55–74 years with a 30 pack-year history, and for formers smokers who have quit within the last 15 years.Design A Markov macrosimulation model estimated: health benefits (health-adjusted life-years (HALYs)), costs and cost-effectiveness of biennial LDCT screening. Input parameters came from literature and NZ-linked health datasets.Setting New Zealand.Participants Population aged 55–74 years in 2011.Interventions Biennial LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with usual care.Outcome measures Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the average difference in costs and HALYs between the screened and the unscreened populations. Equity analyses included substituting non-Māori values for Māori values of background morbidity, mortality and stage-specific survival. Changes in inequities in lung cancer survival and ‘health-adjusted life expectancy’ (HALE) were measured.Results LDCT screening in NZ is likely to be cost-effective for the total population: NZ$34 400 per HALY gained (95% uncertainty interval NZ$27 500 to NZ$42 900) and for Māori separately (using a threshold of gross domestic product per capita NZ$45 000). Health gains per capita for Māori females were twice that for non-Māori females and 25% greater for Māori males compared with non-Māori males. LDCT screening will narrow absolute inequities in HALE and lung cancer mortality for Māori, but will slightly increase relative inequities in mortality from lung cancer (compared with non-Māori) due to differential stage-specific survival.Conclusion A national biennial LDCT lung cancer screening programme in New Zealand is likely to be cost-effective, will improve total population health and reduce health inequities for Māori. Attention must be paid to addressing ethnic inequities in stage-specific lung cancer survival.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037145.full
spellingShingle Sue Crengle
Giorgi Kvizhinadze
Melissa McLeod
Peter Sandiford
Karen Bartholomew
Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
BMJ Open
title Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Impact of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in New Zealand: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort impact of low dose ct screening for lung cancer on ethnic health inequities in new zealand a cost effectiveness analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037145.full
work_keys_str_mv AT suecrengle impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT giorgikvizhinadze impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT melissamcleod impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT petersandiford impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT karenbartholomew impactoflowdosectscreeningforlungcanceronethnichealthinequitiesinnewzealandacosteffectivenessanalysis