The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review

Abstract Purpose This umbrella review aimed to summarise and synthesize the evidence on the outcomes reported and used to assess the value and or efficacy of geriatric assessments (GAs) for older adults with cancer. Methods Six electronic databases, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Librar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharon He, Heather L. Shepherd, Meera Agar, Joanne Shaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05607-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112187293106176
author Sharon He
Heather L. Shepherd
Meera Agar
Joanne Shaw
author_facet Sharon He
Heather L. Shepherd
Meera Agar
Joanne Shaw
author_sort Sharon He
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose This umbrella review aimed to summarise and synthesize the evidence on the outcomes reported and used to assess the value and or efficacy of geriatric assessments (GAs) for older adults with cancer. Methods Six electronic databases, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases, were searched to identify systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses that described the value or outcomes of GAs for older adults with cancer. Results Twenty-six systematic reviews were included, of which six included a meta-analysis of the data. Thirteen associations and or outcomes were identified. Overall geriatric impairments predicted or were associated with majority of identified outcomes. However, the type of domains associated with outcomes differed within and across reviews. Only treatment toxicity was statistically significantly lower for patients allocated to the GA intervention group compared to standard care. Systematic reviews without meta-analyses demonstrated a positive impact of GA with management on treatment completion, communication and care planning and patient satisfaction with care. Conclusion There is evidence demonstrating the predictive value of GAs for older adults with cancer. GAs seems to be beneficial for older adults with cancer across some outcomes, with strong evidence demonstrating the impact of GA with management for treatment toxicity. However, there is mixed or limited evidence demonstrating the effect of GA in other treatment modalities, and on quality of life and economic outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-50706e4d6cd14d81a5cb3b9d221b3579
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2318
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj-art-50706e4d6cd14d81a5cb3b9d221b35792024-12-22T12:46:43ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182024-12-0124113610.1186/s12877-024-05607-9The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella reviewSharon He0Heather L. Shepherd1Meera Agar2Joanne Shaw3Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of SydneySusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of SydneyImproving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology SydneyPsycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of SydneyAbstract Purpose This umbrella review aimed to summarise and synthesize the evidence on the outcomes reported and used to assess the value and or efficacy of geriatric assessments (GAs) for older adults with cancer. Methods Six electronic databases, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases, were searched to identify systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses that described the value or outcomes of GAs for older adults with cancer. Results Twenty-six systematic reviews were included, of which six included a meta-analysis of the data. Thirteen associations and or outcomes were identified. Overall geriatric impairments predicted or were associated with majority of identified outcomes. However, the type of domains associated with outcomes differed within and across reviews. Only treatment toxicity was statistically significantly lower for patients allocated to the GA intervention group compared to standard care. Systematic reviews without meta-analyses demonstrated a positive impact of GA with management on treatment completion, communication and care planning and patient satisfaction with care. Conclusion There is evidence demonstrating the predictive value of GAs for older adults with cancer. GAs seems to be beneficial for older adults with cancer across some outcomes, with strong evidence demonstrating the impact of GA with management for treatment toxicity. However, there is mixed or limited evidence demonstrating the effect of GA in other treatment modalities, and on quality of life and economic outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05607-9Geriatric assessmentsOlder adultsCancerOutcomesUmbrella review
spellingShingle Sharon He
Heather L. Shepherd
Meera Agar
Joanne Shaw
The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
BMC Geriatrics
Geriatric assessments
Older adults
Cancer
Outcomes
Umbrella review
title The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
title_full The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
title_fullStr The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
title_full_unstemmed The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
title_short The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
title_sort value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer an umbrella review
topic Geriatric assessments
Older adults
Cancer
Outcomes
Umbrella review
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05607-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sharonhe thevalueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT heatherlshepherd thevalueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT meeraagar thevalueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT joanneshaw thevalueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT sharonhe valueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT heatherlshepherd valueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT meeraagar valueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview
AT joanneshaw valueandeffectivenessofgeriatricassessmentsforolderadultswithcanceranumbrellareview