Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients

Abstract Aims Heart transplantation is a well‐established treatment for end‐stage heart failure in paediatric patients, demonstrating excellent long‐term outcomes. Methods This retrospective study analyses 35 years of data on 244 paediatric recipients (<18 years) at a single institution from 1986...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa‐Maria Rosenthal, Annemarie Krauss, Oliver Miera, Friederike Danne, Fatima Lunze, Mi‐Young Cho, Joachim Photiadis, Felix Berger, Katharina Schmitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14917
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846128390683230208
author Lisa‐Maria Rosenthal
Annemarie Krauss
Oliver Miera
Friederike Danne
Fatima Lunze
Mi‐Young Cho
Joachim Photiadis
Felix Berger
Katharina Schmitt
author_facet Lisa‐Maria Rosenthal
Annemarie Krauss
Oliver Miera
Friederike Danne
Fatima Lunze
Mi‐Young Cho
Joachim Photiadis
Felix Berger
Katharina Schmitt
author_sort Lisa‐Maria Rosenthal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Heart transplantation is a well‐established treatment for end‐stage heart failure in paediatric patients, demonstrating excellent long‐term outcomes. Methods This retrospective study analyses 35 years of data on 244 paediatric recipients (<18 years) at a single institution from 1986 to 2022. The analysis explores changes in diagnoses, survival, waiting times and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over three decades (1991–2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2020). Results Survival outcomes significantly improved over the study period, with 1‐year survival rates increasing from 79.3% (1991–2000) to 92.3% (2011–2020, P = 0.041). The median overall survival was 18.0 years, and median conditional survival to 1 year post‐transplant was 20.9 years. Survival differences were noted among age groups, with infants under 1 year of age experiencing higher early mortality, and adolescents (aged 11–17 years) facing increased long‐term risks, possibly linked to adult donor characteristics. Waiting times for heart transplantation increased, especially for younger age groups (0–5 and 6–10 years), reflecting the growing demand for donor organs. The use of MCS, including ventricular assist devices (VAD), surged, with 67% of recipients in the most recent decade receiving pre‐transplant VAD support. Importantly, despite prolonged waiting times and increased VAD use, overall survival continued to be favourable. Conclusions Early and long‐term results after paediatric heart transplantation have been continuously improving over the past decades. Despite an increased demand for donor organs and the growing reliance on VAD as bridge to transplantation, post‐transplantation survival is not compromised.
format Article
id doaj-art-505a5986e34a4b038e8c736c27126cdd
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-5822
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj-art-505a5986e34a4b038e8c736c27126cdd2024-12-11T01:56:59ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222024-12-011163626363510.1002/ehf2.14917Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipientsLisa‐Maria Rosenthal0Annemarie Krauss1Oliver Miera2Friederike Danne3Fatima Lunze4Mi‐Young Cho5Joachim Photiadis6Felix Berger7Katharina Schmitt8Department of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease‐Pediatric Cardiology Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin GermanyAbstract Aims Heart transplantation is a well‐established treatment for end‐stage heart failure in paediatric patients, demonstrating excellent long‐term outcomes. Methods This retrospective study analyses 35 years of data on 244 paediatric recipients (<18 years) at a single institution from 1986 to 2022. The analysis explores changes in diagnoses, survival, waiting times and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over three decades (1991–2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2020). Results Survival outcomes significantly improved over the study period, with 1‐year survival rates increasing from 79.3% (1991–2000) to 92.3% (2011–2020, P = 0.041). The median overall survival was 18.0 years, and median conditional survival to 1 year post‐transplant was 20.9 years. Survival differences were noted among age groups, with infants under 1 year of age experiencing higher early mortality, and adolescents (aged 11–17 years) facing increased long‐term risks, possibly linked to adult donor characteristics. Waiting times for heart transplantation increased, especially for younger age groups (0–5 and 6–10 years), reflecting the growing demand for donor organs. The use of MCS, including ventricular assist devices (VAD), surged, with 67% of recipients in the most recent decade receiving pre‐transplant VAD support. Importantly, despite prolonged waiting times and increased VAD use, overall survival continued to be favourable. Conclusions Early and long‐term results after paediatric heart transplantation have been continuously improving over the past decades. Despite an increased demand for donor organs and the growing reliance on VAD as bridge to transplantation, post‐transplantation survival is not compromised.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14917mechanical circulatory supportpaediatric heart transplantationventricular assist devices
spellingShingle Lisa‐Maria Rosenthal
Annemarie Krauss
Oliver Miera
Friederike Danne
Fatima Lunze
Mi‐Young Cho
Joachim Photiadis
Felix Berger
Katharina Schmitt
Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
ESC Heart Failure
mechanical circulatory support
paediatric heart transplantation
ventricular assist devices
title Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
title_full Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
title_fullStr Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
title_short Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
title_sort changes in waiting time need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients
topic mechanical circulatory support
paediatric heart transplantation
ventricular assist devices
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14917
work_keys_str_mv AT lisamariarosenthal changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT annemariekrauss changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT olivermiera changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT friederikedanne changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT fatimalunze changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT miyoungcho changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT joachimphotiadis changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT felixberger changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients
AT katharinaschmitt changesinwaitingtimeneedformechanicalcirculatorysupportandoutcomesinpaediatrichearttransplantrecipients