Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series
Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective case series is to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations for full arch implant supported restorations and report the rate of complications up to 2 years after insertion. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392496 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841524857467043840 |
---|---|
author | Joao Carames Loana Tovar Suinaga Yung Cheng Paul Yu Alejandro Pérez Mary Kang |
author_facet | Joao Carames Loana Tovar Suinaga Yung Cheng Paul Yu Alejandro Pérez Mary Kang |
author_sort | Joao Carames |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective case series is to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations for full arch implant supported restorations and report the rate of complications up to 2 years after insertion. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients received implant placement for monolithic zirconia full arch reconstructions. Four implants were placed in seven arches, eleven arches received six implants, two arches received seven implants, two arches received eight implants, and one arch received nine implants. Results. No implant failures or complications were reported for an implant survival rate of 100% with follow-up ranging from 3 to 24 months. Conclusions. Monolithic zirconia CAD-/CAM-milled framework restorations are a treatment option for full arch restorations over implants, showing a 96% success rate in the present study. Some of the benefits are accuracy, reduced veneering porcelain, and minimal occlusal adjustments. The outcome of the present study showed high success in function, aesthetics, phonetics, and high patient satisfaction. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-504dd06944724c7986c0bf0ea343ce65 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Dentistry |
spelling | doaj-art-504dd06944724c7986c0bf0ea343ce652025-02-03T05:47:08ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362015-01-01201510.1155/2015/392496392496Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case SeriesJoao Carames0Loana Tovar Suinaga1Yung Cheng Paul Yu2Alejandro Pérez3Mary Kang4Faculty of Dental Medicine at the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, PortugalAshman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, Suite 3W, New York, NY 10010, USAAshman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, Suite 3W, New York, NY 10010, USAAshman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, Suite 3W, New York, NY 10010, USAAshman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, Suite 3W, New York, NY 10010, USAPurpose. The purpose of this retrospective case series is to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations for full arch implant supported restorations and report the rate of complications up to 2 years after insertion. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients received implant placement for monolithic zirconia full arch reconstructions. Four implants were placed in seven arches, eleven arches received six implants, two arches received seven implants, two arches received eight implants, and one arch received nine implants. Results. No implant failures or complications were reported for an implant survival rate of 100% with follow-up ranging from 3 to 24 months. Conclusions. Monolithic zirconia CAD-/CAM-milled framework restorations are a treatment option for full arch restorations over implants, showing a 96% success rate in the present study. Some of the benefits are accuracy, reduced veneering porcelain, and minimal occlusal adjustments. The outcome of the present study showed high success in function, aesthetics, phonetics, and high patient satisfaction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392496 |
spellingShingle | Joao Carames Loana Tovar Suinaga Yung Cheng Paul Yu Alejandro Pérez Mary Kang Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series International Journal of Dentistry |
title | Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series |
title_full | Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series |
title_fullStr | Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series |
title_short | Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series |
title_sort | clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations full arch implant supported reconstruction case series |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joaocarames clinicaladvantagesandlimitationsofmonolithiczirconiarestorationsfullarchimplantsupportedreconstructioncaseseries AT loanatovarsuinaga clinicaladvantagesandlimitationsofmonolithiczirconiarestorationsfullarchimplantsupportedreconstructioncaseseries AT yungchengpaulyu clinicaladvantagesandlimitationsofmonolithiczirconiarestorationsfullarchimplantsupportedreconstructioncaseseries AT alejandroperez clinicaladvantagesandlimitationsofmonolithiczirconiarestorationsfullarchimplantsupportedreconstructioncaseseries AT marykang clinicaladvantagesandlimitationsofmonolithiczirconiarestorationsfullarchimplantsupportedreconstructioncaseseries |