The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance

Purpose – I aimed to obtain a deeper insight into the link between supplier involvement in product development (SIPD), supplier relationship resilience and company performance. Design/methodology/approach – To collect data, a survey among 500 Polish manufacturing companies was conducted. I used quan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grażyna Kędzia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2024-05-01
Series:Central European Management Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0095/full/pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846166540970360832
author Grażyna Kędzia
author_facet Grażyna Kędzia
author_sort Grażyna Kędzia
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – I aimed to obtain a deeper insight into the link between supplier involvement in product development (SIPD), supplier relationship resilience and company performance. Design/methodology/approach – To collect data, a survey among 500 Polish manufacturing companies was conducted. I used quantitative methods (structural equation modeling) to test several research hypotheses referring to a single supplier–customer relationship. Thanks to the use of multi-construct measurement of SIPD and supplier relationship resilience, the study provides detailed research results on the topic. Findings – Collaborative practices implemented during SIPD increase procurement flexibility and decrease redundancy in the relationship with the involved supplier. Communication during SIPD increases supplier flexibility and procurement flexibility. Increased supplier flexibility and increased procurement flexibility in the relationship with the involved supplier as well as collaborative practices during SIPD positively impact company performance. I confirmed the indirect effect between communication during SIPD and company performance when the mediators are supplier flexibility and procurement flexibility. Decreased redundancy in relationship with involved supplier does not impact company performance. Practical implications – Supply chain managers need to rethink SIPD practice to effectively ensure supply chain resilience (SCRES), especially in the face of the contemporary global crisis and black swans affecting the supplier base. My article provides important managerial insights into drivers of SCRES and company performance. Originality/value – To the best of my knowledge, this research is among the first to conclude that SIPD does not have an unequivocally positive or direct impact on supplier relationship resilience. The research fills the gap by analyzing the impact of SIPD on two main SCRES elements. The study examines supplier relationship resilience, understood as flexibility and redundancy elements, in a single supplier–buyer relationship perspective. Thus, the presented considerations go beyond the traditional understanding of flexibility and redundancy in supplier relationship management, that is through the prism of double or multi sourcing and having back up-suppliers.
format Article
id doaj-art-4f094b1898a04c0a9d43bbecb9f95a6a
institution Kabale University
issn 2658-0845
2658-2430
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series Central European Management Journal
spelling doaj-art-4f094b1898a04c0a9d43bbecb9f95a6a2024-11-15T13:48:51ZengEmerald PublishingCentral European Management Journal2658-08452658-24302024-05-0132223326110.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0095The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performanceGrażyna Kędzia0Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, Lodz, PolandPurpose – I aimed to obtain a deeper insight into the link between supplier involvement in product development (SIPD), supplier relationship resilience and company performance. Design/methodology/approach – To collect data, a survey among 500 Polish manufacturing companies was conducted. I used quantitative methods (structural equation modeling) to test several research hypotheses referring to a single supplier–customer relationship. Thanks to the use of multi-construct measurement of SIPD and supplier relationship resilience, the study provides detailed research results on the topic. Findings – Collaborative practices implemented during SIPD increase procurement flexibility and decrease redundancy in the relationship with the involved supplier. Communication during SIPD increases supplier flexibility and procurement flexibility. Increased supplier flexibility and increased procurement flexibility in the relationship with the involved supplier as well as collaborative practices during SIPD positively impact company performance. I confirmed the indirect effect between communication during SIPD and company performance when the mediators are supplier flexibility and procurement flexibility. Decreased redundancy in relationship with involved supplier does not impact company performance. Practical implications – Supply chain managers need to rethink SIPD practice to effectively ensure supply chain resilience (SCRES), especially in the face of the contemporary global crisis and black swans affecting the supplier base. My article provides important managerial insights into drivers of SCRES and company performance. Originality/value – To the best of my knowledge, this research is among the first to conclude that SIPD does not have an unequivocally positive or direct impact on supplier relationship resilience. The research fills the gap by analyzing the impact of SIPD on two main SCRES elements. The study examines supplier relationship resilience, understood as flexibility and redundancy elements, in a single supplier–buyer relationship perspective. Thus, the presented considerations go beyond the traditional understanding of flexibility and redundancy in supplier relationship management, that is through the prism of double or multi sourcing and having back up-suppliers.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0095/full/pdfSupplier-customer relationshipJoint product developmentSupply chain resilienceSupply chain riskSupply chain flexibilityRedundancy
spellingShingle Grażyna Kędzia
The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
Central European Management Journal
Supplier-customer relationship
Joint product development
Supply chain resilience
Supply chain risk
Supply chain flexibility
Redundancy
title The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
title_full The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
title_fullStr The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
title_full_unstemmed The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
title_short The ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
title_sort ambiguous impact of supplier involvement in product development on supplier relationship resilience and company performance
topic Supplier-customer relationship
Joint product development
Supply chain resilience
Supply chain risk
Supply chain flexibility
Redundancy
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0095/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT grazynakedzia theambiguousimpactofsupplierinvolvementinproductdevelopmentonsupplierrelationshipresilienceandcompanyperformance
AT grazynakedzia ambiguousimpactofsupplierinvolvementinproductdevelopmentonsupplierrelationshipresilienceandcompanyperformance