Development and Pilot Testing of PrOFILE‐ST: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Capacity and Quality Assessment Tool for Resource‐Limited Settings

ABSTRACT Background The global incidence of childhood cancer is rising, with nearly 90% of cases occurring in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), where mortality remains high due to limited access to quality pediatric surgical care. To address this, the International Society of Pediatric Surgi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda Kelly Marques deSouza, Simone deCampos Vieira Abib, Rodrigo Chaves Ribeiro, Débora Rebollo deCampos, Lily Saldaña Gallo, Raul Ramirez De la Cruz, Jaime Shalkow‐Klincovstein, Jesús Ponce‐Cruz, Mohammed Elnour, Amon Ngongola, Seith Kalota, Bruce Bvulani, Logan Houston, Riya Misal, Heather Forrest, Nadya Sullivan, Alyana Alvarez, Srikanth Naradasu, Aman Maru, Miriam L. Gonzalez‐Guzman, Paola Friedrich, Abdelhafeez Abdelhafeez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71122
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Background The global incidence of childhood cancer is rising, with nearly 90% of cases occurring in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), where mortality remains high due to limited access to quality pediatric surgical care. To address this, the International Society of Pediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital developed the Pediatric Oncology Facility Integrated Local Evaluation Surgical Tool (PrOFILE‐ST) to assess surgical capacity and quality in resource‐limited settings. Methods PrOFILE‐ST was developed in three stages: construction, content validation, and pilot testing. The tool was refined over three years through biweekly team meetings and expert feedback. Pilot testing took place at six institutions across five countries (Sudan, Zambia, Peru, Mexico, Brazil), collecting both quantitative and qualitative data on surgical practices. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, producing reports to guide quality improvement. Results The final tool consists of 12 modules and 273 questions. Pilot testing revealed differences in surgical capacity between upper‐middle‐income countries (UMICs) and lower middle/low‐income countries (LMICs/LICs). UMICs had better infrastructure, while LMICs/LICs excelled in surgical reporting and timeliness. Improvement priorities included the development of pediatric surgical oncology fellowships, standardization of operative reporting, systematic morbidity and mortality analysis, and establishment of real‐time multidisciplinary team discussions. Conclusions PrOFILE‐ST is an effective tool for assessing pediatric oncology surgery across diverse settings, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement. It can guide quality improvement efforts to address global disparities in childhood cancer outcomes.
ISSN:2045-7634