Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models
Objective: This study aimed to compare the manufacturing accuracy of different printing techniques - Stereolithography (SLA), Digital Light Processing (DLP), and PolyJet-using digital dental models. Methods: The study included cast models of 30 patients aged between 12 and 20 years. The selected mo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://turkjorthod.org/articles/accuracy-of-3d-printer-technologies-using-digital-dental-models/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.8 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841556271395766272 |
---|---|
author | Şule Gökmen Serkan Görgülü Kübra Gülnur Topsakal Gökhan Serhat Duran |
author_facet | Şule Gökmen Serkan Görgülü Kübra Gülnur Topsakal Gökhan Serhat Duran |
author_sort | Şule Gökmen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: This study aimed to compare the manufacturing accuracy of different printing techniques - Stereolithography (SLA), Digital Light Processing (DLP), and PolyJet-using digital dental models.
Methods: The study included cast models of 30 patients aged between 12 and 20 years. The selected models were scanned using an intraoral scanner, and surface topography format files were obtained. The models were produced from 3D printers with SLA, DLP, and PolyJet technology and scanned with an intraoral scanner. The digital files of the reference and printed models were superimposed with reverse engineering software. Root mean squared (RMS) values and point registration differences were evaluated. Furthermore, digital mesiodistal measurements of the teeth were taken to determine the point registration deviation values. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the measurements. ANOVA was used to evaluate differences between normally distributed data. In addition, a box plot was used to show the variability in the measurements, and the Bland-Altman test was used to examine the agreement between the measurements.
Results: According to the digital superimposition data of DLP-SLA-PolyJet technologies, PolyJet had the smallest RMS (0.145±0.10 mm), followed by DLP and SLA (0.161±0.12 mm and 0.345±0.23 mm, respectively). In the mesiodistal dimensional measurement evaluations, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the averages of the main reference and DLP, PolyJet, and SLA measurements for all teeth.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, all three production technologies are clinically usable at the model production stage. However, SLA was found to be less accurate than DLP and PolyJet. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4e36ba66ad114059b61b79a44b7e3cf4 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2528-9659 2148-9505 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
spelling | doaj-art-4e36ba66ad114059b61b79a44b7e3cf42025-01-07T10:29:18ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052024-12-0137425726410.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.8Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental ModelsŞule Gökmen0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0677-3472Serkan Görgülü1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-573XKübra Gülnur Topsakal2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-3492Gökhan Serhat Duran3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6178University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, TurkeyUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, TurkeyUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, TurkeyÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Çanakkale, TurkeyObjective: This study aimed to compare the manufacturing accuracy of different printing techniques - Stereolithography (SLA), Digital Light Processing (DLP), and PolyJet-using digital dental models. Methods: The study included cast models of 30 patients aged between 12 and 20 years. The selected models were scanned using an intraoral scanner, and surface topography format files were obtained. The models were produced from 3D printers with SLA, DLP, and PolyJet technology and scanned with an intraoral scanner. The digital files of the reference and printed models were superimposed with reverse engineering software. Root mean squared (RMS) values and point registration differences were evaluated. Furthermore, digital mesiodistal measurements of the teeth were taken to determine the point registration deviation values. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the measurements. ANOVA was used to evaluate differences between normally distributed data. In addition, a box plot was used to show the variability in the measurements, and the Bland-Altman test was used to examine the agreement between the measurements. Results: According to the digital superimposition data of DLP-SLA-PolyJet technologies, PolyJet had the smallest RMS (0.145±0.10 mm), followed by DLP and SLA (0.161±0.12 mm and 0.345±0.23 mm, respectively). In the mesiodistal dimensional measurement evaluations, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the averages of the main reference and DLP, PolyJet, and SLA measurements for all teeth. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, all three production technologies are clinically usable at the model production stage. However, SLA was found to be less accurate than DLP and PolyJet.https://turkjorthod.org/articles/accuracy-of-3d-printer-technologies-using-digital-dental-models/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.83-dimensional3-dimensional printingdigital dentistrydigital models |
spellingShingle | Şule Gökmen Serkan Görgülü Kübra Gülnur Topsakal Gökhan Serhat Duran Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 3-dimensional 3-dimensional printing digital dentistry digital models |
title | Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models |
title_full | Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models |
title_short | Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models |
title_sort | accuracy of 3d printer technologies using digital dental models |
topic | 3-dimensional 3-dimensional printing digital dentistry digital models |
url | https://turkjorthod.org/articles/accuracy-of-3d-printer-technologies-using-digital-dental-models/doi/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sulegokmen accuracyof3dprintertechnologiesusingdigitaldentalmodels AT serkangorgulu accuracyof3dprintertechnologiesusingdigitaldentalmodels AT kubragulnurtopsakal accuracyof3dprintertechnologiesusingdigitaldentalmodels AT gokhanserhatduran accuracyof3dprintertechnologiesusingdigitaldentalmodels |