Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors

System operators (SOs) manage power supply, focusing on risk management. In small emerging economies, proactive risk management is crucial as major disruptions require SOs to redirect resources into recovery efforts. Therefore, SOs prioritize risk reduction, proactively minimizing the possibility of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khadija Sherece Usher, Benjamin Craig McLellan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/49
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549265513480192
author Khadija Sherece Usher
Benjamin Craig McLellan
author_facet Khadija Sherece Usher
Benjamin Craig McLellan
author_sort Khadija Sherece Usher
collection DOAJ
description System operators (SOs) manage power supply, focusing on risk management. In small emerging economies, proactive risk management is crucial as major disruptions require SOs to redirect resources into recovery efforts. Therefore, SOs prioritize risk reduction, proactively minimizing the possibility of major disruption to ensure the industry’s long-term advancement. However, SOs frequently focus on residual risk mitigation while ignoring their exposure to inherent risk. This study investigated the inherent risks associated with power supply management using the SO’s operations and pertinent third parties. It used a seasonal multivariate strategy to identify risk factors, create univariate distribution models, and generate multivariate distributions using the copula method. Joint risk exposure was calculated using different percentile metrics for each scenario, allowing for a comparison of exposure levels. The study found that risk variables can sometimes reinforce or offset each other, impacting exposure behaviour. Exposure levels indicate periods of increased or decreased exposure to risk variables. Copula-modelled interdependencies captured larger exposure levels but had lower unit likelihoods, presenting less conservative exposure forecasts for SO managers. Case 1 exhibited the highest exposure levels in the early dry season (0.237 and 0.179), while case 2 showed peak exposure levels in the late wet season (1.009 and 0.948), along with cases 3 (0.977 and 0.908) and 4 (0.950 and 0.879).
format Article
id doaj-art-4dd731a187c44c09a61f8a83c0d177ca
institution Kabale University
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-4dd731a187c44c09a61f8a83c0d177ca2025-01-10T13:16:56ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732024-12-011814910.3390/en18010049Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party ActorsKhadija Sherece Usher0Benjamin Craig McLellan1Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JapanGraduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JapanSystem operators (SOs) manage power supply, focusing on risk management. In small emerging economies, proactive risk management is crucial as major disruptions require SOs to redirect resources into recovery efforts. Therefore, SOs prioritize risk reduction, proactively minimizing the possibility of major disruption to ensure the industry’s long-term advancement. However, SOs frequently focus on residual risk mitigation while ignoring their exposure to inherent risk. This study investigated the inherent risks associated with power supply management using the SO’s operations and pertinent third parties. It used a seasonal multivariate strategy to identify risk factors, create univariate distribution models, and generate multivariate distributions using the copula method. Joint risk exposure was calculated using different percentile metrics for each scenario, allowing for a comparison of exposure levels. The study found that risk variables can sometimes reinforce or offset each other, impacting exposure behaviour. Exposure levels indicate periods of increased or decreased exposure to risk variables. Copula-modelled interdependencies captured larger exposure levels but had lower unit likelihoods, presenting less conservative exposure forecasts for SO managers. Case 1 exhibited the highest exposure levels in the early dry season (0.237 and 0.179), while case 2 showed peak exposure levels in the late wet season (1.009 and 0.948), along with cases 3 (0.977 and 0.908) and 4 (0.950 and 0.879).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/49risk managementinherent riskpower mixelectricity sectorsystem operator
spellingShingle Khadija Sherece Usher
Benjamin Craig McLellan
Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
Energies
risk management
inherent risk
power mix
electricity sector
system operator
title Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
title_full Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
title_fullStr Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
title_full_unstemmed Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
title_short Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors
title_sort inherent risk analysis of power supply management case of belize s system operator and third party actors
topic risk management
inherent risk
power mix
electricity sector
system operator
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/49
work_keys_str_mv AT khadijashereceusher inherentriskanalysisofpowersupplymanagementcaseofbelizessystemoperatorandthirdpartyactors
AT benjamincraigmclellan inherentriskanalysisofpowersupplymanagementcaseofbelizessystemoperatorandthirdpartyactors