Incidence of Inappropriate CPR in the Emergency Department – Is ReSPECT making a difference?
Introduction: A BMJ study suggested that one in five sick, older patients have a ‘do not resuscitate’ document and a large proportion only had this completed in the Emergency Department (ED) (1). Current ED pressures could cause greater delay in this discussion, resulting in inappropriate cardiopulm...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Future Healthcare Journal |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2514664524002169 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Introduction: A BMJ study suggested that one in five sick, older patients have a ‘do not resuscitate’ document and a large proportion only had this completed in the Emergency Department (ED) (1). Current ED pressures could cause greater delay in this discussion, resulting in inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The ReSPECT form was established to bring consistency to the communication of patients wishes, including ‘do not attempt CPR’ (DNACPR) (2). This QUIP assessed the incidence of inappropriate CPR in two ED's by investigating the proportion of CPR performed on those with a prior DNACPR or ReSPECT form. Method: Data was collected retrospectively from cardiac arrests in two ED's between the 1 January 2023 and the 17 November 2023. The three parameters assessed were the number patients undergoing CPR, number with prior DNACPR/ReSPECT forms, and how often CPR occurred within 30 minutes of patient arrival. Hospital A used ReSPECT forms, whereas Hospital B did not. Results: Over the assessed period, CPR was performed on 21 patients at Hospital A. Of these, 19% had prior DNACPR/ReSPECT forms and 43% of CPR was within 30 minutes of patient arrival. 10 patients received CPR at Hospital B. Of these, 0 patients had prior DNACPR/ReSPECT forms and 40% of CPR occurred within 30 minutes of patient arrival. Conclusion: Hospital A performed CPR on more patients with prior DNACPRs compared to hospital B. Occasionally, these DNACPRs were on the GP portal but were not easily accessible in the hospital setting due to the hospital's paper-based notes system. Both sites performed CPR on a similar proportion of patients within 30 minutes of admission. This highlights the importance of prompt decisions, communication and the need for community discussion with documentation that is easily accessible across healthcare settings. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2514-6645 |