A European Res publica

The article analyses the fundamental constitutional enigma of the European Union (EU), namely whether the EU can be considered as a (from its Member States) separate and independent constitutional legal order. The EU is often referred to as a legal order sui generis, i.e. of a unique characte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ola Zetterquist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2010-12-01
Series:Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Subjects:
Online Access:https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846157019985215488
author Ola Zetterquist
author_facet Ola Zetterquist
author_sort Ola Zetterquist
collection DOAJ
description The article analyses the fundamental constitutional enigma of the European Union (EU), namely whether the EU can be considered as a (from its Member States) separate and independent constitutional legal order. The EU is often referred to as a legal order sui generis, i.e. of a unique character that defies traditional definitions. More specifically, the notion of an independent and separate EU is at odds with the idea of the sovereign state. The notion of the EU as a legal order sui generis is too much influenced by the models of the sovereign state and sovereignty (in the vein of Thomas Hobbes). The key component in the Hobbesian idea of sovereignty is freedom as non-interference. A sovereign state is consequently a state that is free from, i.e. not interfered with by, external actors like, for example, the EU. Put differently, either the EU is sovereign or the Member States are sovereign. By shifting the perspective to a neo-Roman republican understanding of freedom as non-domination the constitutional picture of the EU will become more nuanced. Res publica is best understood as what citizens hold in common and above their narrow self-interest. According to a republican notion of the constitution the purpose of the law is to eliminate the possibility of arbitrary domination. For that reason, not all interference is to be considered as a restriction of freedom but only those restrictions that cannot be justified according to the res publica. Viewed through the republican prism it can be argued that the EU represents an important advancement in securing freedom as non-domination without implying that the EU must become a state. The fundamental enigma can thus be rephrased as a clash between two diverging concepts of freedom. Whereas the EU will always be at odds with the idea of sovereignty (however framed) it will be much easier to reconcile with the republican ideal. DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837332
format Article
id doaj-art-4d33cfad9176429798759371c1a8aa8f
institution Kabale University
issn 2079-5971
language English
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
record_format Article
series Oñati Socio-Legal Series
spelling doaj-art-4d33cfad9176429798759371c1a8aa8f2024-11-25T15:05:59ZengOñati International Institute for the Sociology of LawOñati Socio-Legal Series2079-59712010-12-011519A European Res publicaOla Zetterquist0Gothenburg University The article analyses the fundamental constitutional enigma of the European Union (EU), namely whether the EU can be considered as a (from its Member States) separate and independent constitutional legal order. The EU is often referred to as a legal order sui generis, i.e. of a unique character that defies traditional definitions. More specifically, the notion of an independent and separate EU is at odds with the idea of the sovereign state. The notion of the EU as a legal order sui generis is too much influenced by the models of the sovereign state and sovereignty (in the vein of Thomas Hobbes). The key component in the Hobbesian idea of sovereignty is freedom as non-interference. A sovereign state is consequently a state that is free from, i.e. not interfered with by, external actors like, for example, the EU. Put differently, either the EU is sovereign or the Member States are sovereign. By shifting the perspective to a neo-Roman republican understanding of freedom as non-domination the constitutional picture of the EU will become more nuanced. Res publica is best understood as what citizens hold in common and above their narrow self-interest. According to a republican notion of the constitution the purpose of the law is to eliminate the possibility of arbitrary domination. For that reason, not all interference is to be considered as a restriction of freedom but only those restrictions that cannot be justified according to the res publica. Viewed through the republican prism it can be argued that the EU represents an important advancement in securing freedom as non-domination without implying that the EU must become a state. The fundamental enigma can thus be rephrased as a clash between two diverging concepts of freedom. Whereas the EU will always be at odds with the idea of sovereignty (however framed) it will be much easier to reconcile with the republican ideal. DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1837332 https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/20Constitutional theoryEU-constitutionSovereigntyRepublican TheoryRes Publica
spellingShingle Ola Zetterquist
A European Res publica
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Constitutional theory
EU-constitution
Sovereignty
Republican Theory
Res Publica
title A European Res publica
title_full A European Res publica
title_fullStr A European Res publica
title_full_unstemmed A European Res publica
title_short A European Res publica
title_sort european res publica
topic Constitutional theory
EU-constitution
Sovereignty
Republican Theory
Res Publica
url https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/20
work_keys_str_mv AT olazetterquist aeuropeanrespublica
AT olazetterquist europeanrespublica