Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité

The concepts of resilience and vulnerability have been used in different disciplines to analyze and manage the dynamics of geographical areas and social groups facing rapid and uncertain changes. Both concepts are used within a variety of frameworks of analysis of society-environment relationships....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pauline Buchheit, Patrick d’Aquino, Olivier Ducourtieux
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2016-05-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/17131
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841552881475387392
author Pauline Buchheit
Patrick d’Aquino
Olivier Ducourtieux
author_facet Pauline Buchheit
Patrick d’Aquino
Olivier Ducourtieux
author_sort Pauline Buchheit
collection DOAJ
description The concepts of resilience and vulnerability have been used in different disciplines to analyze and manage the dynamics of geographical areas and social groups facing rapid and uncertain changes. Both concepts are used within a variety of frameworks of analysis of society-environment relationships. This article aims to review the different analytical frameworks and their respective contributions to the analysis of the interactions between social and ecological dynamics. While all reviewed frameworks take into account the interactions of individuals with their environment, they do not, however, assess the vulnerability and resilience at the same scales. In particular, some frameworks are actor-centered, while others are system-centered. We propose a framework which reconciles these two approaches. This framework considers a socioecosystem both as a specific representation of the environment offered by a stakeholder, and as a set of elements contributing to one final function, and organized in a hierarchy of levels of observation, in which each level corresponds to an intermediary function. We propose a participatory approach to confront the systemic representations that have been built by different actors about their environment, and in particular to confront the functions that have been assigned within these representations to the different levels of observation. This process is not intended to lead to a shared vision of an area and its functions, but rather to discuss the potential complementarity of the issues and stakes presented by different actors, before any further assessment of the vulnerability and resilience of the study area to specific changes.
format Article
id doaj-art-4c73b10a01d24e7a8a1faf7df06938d0
institution Kabale University
issn 1492-8442
language fra
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
record_format Article
series VertigO
spelling doaj-art-4c73b10a01d24e7a8a1faf7df06938d02025-01-09T12:40:15ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422016-05-0116110.4000/vertigo.17131Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilitéPauline BuchheitPatrick d’AquinoOlivier DucourtieuxThe concepts of resilience and vulnerability have been used in different disciplines to analyze and manage the dynamics of geographical areas and social groups facing rapid and uncertain changes. Both concepts are used within a variety of frameworks of analysis of society-environment relationships. This article aims to review the different analytical frameworks and their respective contributions to the analysis of the interactions between social and ecological dynamics. While all reviewed frameworks take into account the interactions of individuals with their environment, they do not, however, assess the vulnerability and resilience at the same scales. In particular, some frameworks are actor-centered, while others are system-centered. We propose a framework which reconciles these two approaches. This framework considers a socioecosystem both as a specific representation of the environment offered by a stakeholder, and as a set of elements contributing to one final function, and organized in a hierarchy of levels of observation, in which each level corresponds to an intermediary function. We propose a participatory approach to confront the systemic representations that have been built by different actors about their environment, and in particular to confront the functions that have been assigned within these representations to the different levels of observation. This process is not intended to lead to a shared vision of an area and its functions, but rather to discuss the potential complementarity of the issues and stakes presented by different actors, before any further assessment of the vulnerability and resilience of the study area to specific changes.https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/17131vulnerabilityresiliencefunctionssystem representationscompanion modeling
spellingShingle Pauline Buchheit
Patrick d’Aquino
Olivier Ducourtieux
Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
VertigO
vulnerability
resilience
functions
system representations
companion modeling
title Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
title_full Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
title_fullStr Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
title_full_unstemmed Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
title_short Cadres théoriques mobilisant les concepts de résilience et de vulnérabilité
title_sort cadres theoriques mobilisant les concepts de resilience et de vulnerabilite
topic vulnerability
resilience
functions
system representations
companion modeling
url https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/17131
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinebuchheit cadrestheoriquesmobilisantlesconceptsderesilienceetdevulnerabilite
AT patrickdaquino cadrestheoriquesmobilisantlesconceptsderesilienceetdevulnerabilite
AT olivierducourtieux cadrestheoriquesmobilisantlesconceptsderesilienceetdevulnerabilite