Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays

Objectives: To evaluate the fracture resistance and mode of failure of maxillary premolars restorations restored with nanohybrid Composite, ORMOCER and Ceramic Inlays. Materials and method: 100 extracted first maxillary premolar were collected. Samples were divided into five groups. Group I – Intact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohit. K. Gunwal, Pratima R. Shenoi, Tanvee Paranjape, Sonal Dhote, Ravish Tongya, Magesh Kumar, Sanjay Rastogi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817301550
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846159667881836544
author Mohit. K. Gunwal
Pratima R. Shenoi
Tanvee Paranjape
Sonal Dhote
Ravish Tongya
Magesh Kumar
Sanjay Rastogi
author_facet Mohit. K. Gunwal
Pratima R. Shenoi
Tanvee Paranjape
Sonal Dhote
Ravish Tongya
Magesh Kumar
Sanjay Rastogi
author_sort Mohit. K. Gunwal
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To evaluate the fracture resistance and mode of failure of maxillary premolars restorations restored with nanohybrid Composite, ORMOCER and Ceramic Inlays. Materials and method: 100 extracted first maxillary premolar were collected. Samples were divided into five groups. Group I – Intact premolars, Group II –MOD cavities without restorations, Group III – MOD cavities restored with composite restoration, GROUP IV – MOD cavities restored with ORMOCER restoration and GROUP V – MOD cavities restored with ceramic inlays. All the samples were sent for the axial compression test under the universal testing machine. Fracture resistance and fracture modes were recorded. Result: Highest fracture resistance was achieved in Group V (1324.74 ± 336.78) almost comparable to that of natural tooth (1381.07 ± 259.36) (p < 0.05), followed by Group IV (MOD cavities with ORMOCER restorations) (1082.27 ± 351.27) (p < 0.01) and least fracture resistance in Group III (MOD cavities with composite restorations) (778.35 ± 100.25) (p < 0.0001). Mode of fracture in Group IV and Group V are almost similar and In Group III 65% of the cases showed non-restorable fractures. Conclusion: ORMOCER fracture resistance along with other groups of clinically restorable fracture stand better than Nanohybrid composite. Clinical Relevance: Based on the present study, the dentist can utilize the ORMOCER material as a restoration material for the cavities of posterior teeth which is better in terms of fracture resistance and durability of the restoration when compare to nanohybrid composite.
format Article
id doaj-art-4bac3a1ff69748e89c5a983d20db1d0e
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-4bac3a1ff69748e89c5a983d20db1d0e2024-11-23T06:27:26ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682018-05-0182134139Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlaysMohit. K. Gunwal0Pratima R. Shenoi1Tanvee Paranjape2Sonal Dhote3Ravish Tongya4Magesh Kumar5Sanjay Rastogi6Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Index institute of dental sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, VSPM’S Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, IndiaDept. of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Index institute of dental sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaPrivate Practice, Consevative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Prosthodontics, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Periodontics, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, UP, India; Corresponding author.Objectives: To evaluate the fracture resistance and mode of failure of maxillary premolars restorations restored with nanohybrid Composite, ORMOCER and Ceramic Inlays. Materials and method: 100 extracted first maxillary premolar were collected. Samples were divided into five groups. Group I – Intact premolars, Group II –MOD cavities without restorations, Group III – MOD cavities restored with composite restoration, GROUP IV – MOD cavities restored with ORMOCER restoration and GROUP V – MOD cavities restored with ceramic inlays. All the samples were sent for the axial compression test under the universal testing machine. Fracture resistance and fracture modes were recorded. Result: Highest fracture resistance was achieved in Group V (1324.74 ± 336.78) almost comparable to that of natural tooth (1381.07 ± 259.36) (p < 0.05), followed by Group IV (MOD cavities with ORMOCER restorations) (1082.27 ± 351.27) (p < 0.01) and least fracture resistance in Group III (MOD cavities with composite restorations) (778.35 ± 100.25) (p < 0.0001). Mode of fracture in Group IV and Group V are almost similar and In Group III 65% of the cases showed non-restorable fractures. Conclusion: ORMOCER fracture resistance along with other groups of clinically restorable fracture stand better than Nanohybrid composite. Clinical Relevance: Based on the present study, the dentist can utilize the ORMOCER material as a restoration material for the cavities of posterior teeth which is better in terms of fracture resistance and durability of the restoration when compare to nanohybrid composite.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817301550Ceramic InlaysFracture ResistanceMode of FractureNanohybrid CompositeORMOCER
spellingShingle Mohit. K. Gunwal
Pratima R. Shenoi
Tanvee Paranjape
Sonal Dhote
Ravish Tongya
Magesh Kumar
Sanjay Rastogi
Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Ceramic Inlays
Fracture Resistance
Mode of Fracture
Nanohybrid Composite
ORMOCER
title Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
title_full Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
title_fullStr Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
title_short Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays
title_sort evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite ormocer and ceramic inlays
topic Ceramic Inlays
Fracture Resistance
Mode of Fracture
Nanohybrid Composite
ORMOCER
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817301550
work_keys_str_mv AT mohitkgunwal evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT pratimarshenoi evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT tanveeparanjape evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT sonaldhote evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT ravishtongya evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT mageshkumar evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays
AT sanjayrastogi evaluationoffractureresistanceandmodeoffailureofpremolarsrestoredwithnanohybridcompositeormocerandceramicinlays