Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton & Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is any physical, sexual, or psychological abuse or violence, including stalking and coercive behavior such as degradation, intimidation, and control. IPV self-stigma is the awareness of and agreeance with negative IPV stereotypes/attitudes that are internalized by ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robyn Brunton, Myoungju Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-11-01
Series:Acta Psychologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004542
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846123547767865344
author Robyn Brunton
Myoungju Shin
author_facet Robyn Brunton
Myoungju Shin
author_sort Robyn Brunton
collection DOAJ
description Intimate partner violence (IPV) is any physical, sexual, or psychological abuse or violence, including stalking and coercive behavior such as degradation, intimidation, and control. IPV self-stigma is the awareness of and agreeance with negative IPV stereotypes/attitudes that are internalized by individuals victimized by IPV. IPV stereotypes contribute to self-stigma (e.g., internalization of beliefs and stereotypes, and anticipation of adverse reactions based on the stigma associated with IPV), which may be a barrier to help-seeking. However, the lack of psychometrically sound measurement of IPV self-stigma limits this area of research. The Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023) was developed to fill this gap, and this study provides further psychometric examination of the scale by examining criterion-related validity and confirming the scale's factor structure. Participants, (n = 320, Mage = 38.46, SD = 13.65) predominantly Caucasian/white/European, identifying as female and heterosexual, well-educated and not under major or severe financial stress, completed the IPVIS and measures of IPV, fear of negative evaluation, emotional support, social isolation, anxiety, depression, IPV attitudes, devaluation/discrimination, and secrecy. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the previously established unidimensionality of the IPVIS and criterion-related validity was demonstrated by correlations with similar variables (depression and anxiety, rs = 0.36, devalued or discriminated against, r = 0.44 and secrecy as a coping orientation, r = 0.36). The IPVIS also predicted isolation (β = 0.24, p < .001) and secrecy (β = 0.34, p < .001). The scale showed strong internal consistency, ω = 0.96. Findings were replicated with a smaller subsample of 160 individuals (aged 18–75, M = 37.93, SD = 13.02, predominantly female, with a Caucasian/white/European cultural identity, heterosexual sexual orientation, well-educated and not under major or severe financial stress) who indicated emotional or physical partner abuse. The limitations of this study include the cross-sectional design, a lack of invariance tests and under-representation of certain minority groups. The key strength of the IPVIS is its demonstrated reliability, validity and as previously established, its potential suitability to examine IPV self-stigma for diverse individuals and relationship types.
format Article
id doaj-art-48922e98983a43899f488f2ef8ffa589
institution Kabale University
issn 0001-6918
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Acta Psychologica
spelling doaj-art-48922e98983a43899f488f2ef8ffa5892024-12-14T06:28:18ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182024-11-01251104576Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validityRobyn Brunton0Myoungju Shin1Corresponding author.; School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, AustraliaIntimate partner violence (IPV) is any physical, sexual, or psychological abuse or violence, including stalking and coercive behavior such as degradation, intimidation, and control. IPV self-stigma is the awareness of and agreeance with negative IPV stereotypes/attitudes that are internalized by individuals victimized by IPV. IPV stereotypes contribute to self-stigma (e.g., internalization of beliefs and stereotypes, and anticipation of adverse reactions based on the stigma associated with IPV), which may be a barrier to help-seeking. However, the lack of psychometrically sound measurement of IPV self-stigma limits this area of research. The Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023) was developed to fill this gap, and this study provides further psychometric examination of the scale by examining criterion-related validity and confirming the scale's factor structure. Participants, (n = 320, Mage = 38.46, SD = 13.65) predominantly Caucasian/white/European, identifying as female and heterosexual, well-educated and not under major or severe financial stress, completed the IPVIS and measures of IPV, fear of negative evaluation, emotional support, social isolation, anxiety, depression, IPV attitudes, devaluation/discrimination, and secrecy. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the previously established unidimensionality of the IPVIS and criterion-related validity was demonstrated by correlations with similar variables (depression and anxiety, rs = 0.36, devalued or discriminated against, r = 0.44 and secrecy as a coping orientation, r = 0.36). The IPVIS also predicted isolation (β = 0.24, p < .001) and secrecy (β = 0.34, p < .001). The scale showed strong internal consistency, ω = 0.96. Findings were replicated with a smaller subsample of 160 individuals (aged 18–75, M = 37.93, SD = 13.02, predominantly female, with a Caucasian/white/European cultural identity, heterosexual sexual orientation, well-educated and not under major or severe financial stress) who indicated emotional or physical partner abuse. The limitations of this study include the cross-sectional design, a lack of invariance tests and under-representation of certain minority groups. The key strength of the IPVIS is its demonstrated reliability, validity and as previously established, its potential suitability to examine IPV self-stigma for diverse individuals and relationship types.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004542Intimate partner violenceStigmaSelf-stigmaStereotypesIPVDomestic violence
spellingShingle Robyn Brunton
Myoungju Shin
Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
Acta Psychologica
Intimate partner violence
Stigma
Self-stigma
Stereotypes
IPV
Domestic violence
title Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
title_full Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
title_fullStr Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
title_full_unstemmed Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
title_short Further psychometric examination of the Intimate Partner Violence Internalized Stigma Scale (IPVIS; Brunton &amp; Harris, 2023): Examining criterion-related validity
title_sort further psychometric examination of the intimate partner violence internalized stigma scale ipvis brunton amp harris 2023 examining criterion related validity
topic Intimate partner violence
Stigma
Self-stigma
Stereotypes
IPV
Domestic violence
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004542
work_keys_str_mv AT robynbrunton furtherpsychometricexaminationoftheintimatepartnerviolenceinternalizedstigmascaleipvisbruntonampharris2023examiningcriterionrelatedvalidity
AT myoungjushin furtherpsychometricexaminationoftheintimatepartnerviolenceinternalizedstigmascaleipvisbruntonampharris2023examiningcriterionrelatedvalidity