Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy

This study investigates the impacts of Ground Control Points (GCP) reliability, quantity, and distribution on the accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetric 3D mapping. Previous studies have predominantly focused on overall accuracy metrics, often overlooking local variations in error...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haonan Zhong, Yansong Duan, Pengjie Tao, Zuxun Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-01-01
Series:Geo-spatial Information Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10095020.2025.2451204
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841525288592211968
author Haonan Zhong
Yansong Duan
Pengjie Tao
Zuxun Zhang
author_facet Haonan Zhong
Yansong Duan
Pengjie Tao
Zuxun Zhang
author_sort Haonan Zhong
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the impacts of Ground Control Points (GCP) reliability, quantity, and distribution on the accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetric 3D mapping. Previous studies have predominantly focused on overall accuracy metrics, often overlooking local variations in error distribution and failing to conduct thorough analysis of error sources, potentially resulting in inefficiencies and reduced photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy due to sub-optimal GCP deployment and processing strategies. By employing a structured framework, this research analyzes GCP roles based on variations in their reliability. Aerial images of undulated terrains were analyzed and fifteen distinct GCP configurations were designed which incorporated various distributions and quantities. Random noise was added to simulate GCP reliability unpredictability, subsequently analyzed through a multifaceted approach. The results indicate that GCP reliability influences the upper limit of photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy and significantly affects the influence of GCP quantity and distribution. It was also found that: when GCP reliability is high (RMSE within 0.1 m; density more than 10 GCP/[Formula: see text]), GCP number should prioritize over distribution, ie. accuracy improving as the number of GCPs increases; when GCP reliability is moderated (RMSE within 5 m; density around 5–10 GCP/[Formula: see text]), each of the uniform and distributed-edge distributions leads in different conditions; when GCP reliability is low (RMSE beyond 5 m; density less than 5 GCP/[Formula: see text]) it is favorable to use a distributed-edge and center distribution. Errors typically originate in edge areas and regions with significant topographic variations and propagating as GCP reliability decreases. Therefore, additional GCPs should be placed in error-prone regions to improve the accuracy.
format Article
id doaj-art-47d43d9d343a4badaa74fe198b65209c
institution Kabale University
issn 1009-5020
1993-5153
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Geo-spatial Information Science
spelling doaj-art-47d43d9d343a4badaa74fe198b65209c2025-01-17T14:56:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGeo-spatial Information Science1009-50201993-51532025-01-0112110.1080/10095020.2025.2451204Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracyHaonan Zhong0Yansong Duan1Pengjie Tao2Zuxun Zhang3School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaSchool of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaSchool of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaSchool of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaThis study investigates the impacts of Ground Control Points (GCP) reliability, quantity, and distribution on the accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetric 3D mapping. Previous studies have predominantly focused on overall accuracy metrics, often overlooking local variations in error distribution and failing to conduct thorough analysis of error sources, potentially resulting in inefficiencies and reduced photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy due to sub-optimal GCP deployment and processing strategies. By employing a structured framework, this research analyzes GCP roles based on variations in their reliability. Aerial images of undulated terrains were analyzed and fifteen distinct GCP configurations were designed which incorporated various distributions and quantities. Random noise was added to simulate GCP reliability unpredictability, subsequently analyzed through a multifaceted approach. The results indicate that GCP reliability influences the upper limit of photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy and significantly affects the influence of GCP quantity and distribution. It was also found that: when GCP reliability is high (RMSE within 0.1 m; density more than 10 GCP/[Formula: see text]), GCP number should prioritize over distribution, ie. accuracy improving as the number of GCPs increases; when GCP reliability is moderated (RMSE within 5 m; density around 5–10 GCP/[Formula: see text]), each of the uniform and distributed-edge distributions leads in different conditions; when GCP reliability is low (RMSE beyond 5 m; density less than 5 GCP/[Formula: see text]) it is favorable to use a distributed-edge and center distribution. Errors typically originate in edge areas and regions with significant topographic variations and propagating as GCP reliability decreases. Therefore, additional GCPs should be placed in error-prone regions to improve the accuracy.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10095020.2025.2451204Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetryGround Control Points (GCP)GCP reliabilitymapping accuracyphotogrammetric 3D mapping
spellingShingle Haonan Zhong
Yansong Duan
Pengjie Tao
Zuxun Zhang
Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
Geo-spatial Information Science
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry
Ground Control Points (GCP)
GCP reliability
mapping accuracy
photogrammetric 3D mapping
title Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
title_full Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
title_fullStr Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
title_short Influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on UAV photogrammetric 3D mapping accuracy
title_sort influence of ground control point reliability and distribution on uav photogrammetric 3d mapping accuracy
topic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry
Ground Control Points (GCP)
GCP reliability
mapping accuracy
photogrammetric 3D mapping
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10095020.2025.2451204
work_keys_str_mv AT haonanzhong influenceofgroundcontrolpointreliabilityanddistributiononuavphotogrammetric3dmappingaccuracy
AT yansongduan influenceofgroundcontrolpointreliabilityanddistributiononuavphotogrammetric3dmappingaccuracy
AT pengjietao influenceofgroundcontrolpointreliabilityanddistributiononuavphotogrammetric3dmappingaccuracy
AT zuxunzhang influenceofgroundcontrolpointreliabilityanddistributiononuavphotogrammetric3dmappingaccuracy