Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy

Abstract Purpose This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods From January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jintao Ma, Shaonan Fan, Wenhan Huang, Xiaohong Xu, Yong Hu, Jian He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02571-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112335575384064
author Jintao Ma
Shaonan Fan
Wenhan Huang
Xiaohong Xu
Yong Hu
Jian He
author_facet Jintao Ma
Shaonan Fan
Wenhan Huang
Xiaohong Xu
Yong Hu
Jian He
author_sort Jintao Ma
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods From January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent SBRT. They were categorized into two groups based on the presence of GGO-component: 65 patients in the subsolid group with a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 1 and 174 patients in the solid group with a CTR of 1. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression models for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed for adjusting confounding factors. Recurrence incidence was assessed using competing risk analysis and compared using Gray’s test. Results In the multivariate analysis, female, peripheral location, and subsolid nodules were favorable prognostic factors for LCSS; peripheral location, subsolid nodules, and adjuvant therapy were favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Between the subsolid (n = 65) and solid groups (n = 174), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.003), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.7% versus 80.3%, 90.9% versus 64.1%, 82.7% versus 53.5%, respectively. The median PFS were 72.5 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.030), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 75.4% versus 61.2%, 56.6% versus 44.9%, 48.6% versus 23.3%, respectively. After stabilized IPTW (n = 240), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.024), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.0% versus 82.4%, 92.2% versus 67.7%, 85.3% versus 58.2%, respectively. The median PFS were 60.2 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.096), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 73.8% versus 61.0%, 53.5% versus 46.2%, 46.8% versus 22.4%, respectively. The subsolid group had lower rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) (10.4% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.035) and distant metastasis (DM) (17.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.064) compared to the solid group. Conclusions The presence of GGO-component in the lesion is an independent prognostic factor for LCSS and PFS. Subsolid nodules treated with SBRT demonstrated better prognosis, with significantly lower rates of local-regional recurrence. We should highlight GGO-component as a practical indicator for risk stratification of SBRT patients to guide treatment decisions.
format Article
id doaj-art-4716520a8f7c49b5abbe569ddffd2b54
institution Kabale University
issn 1748-717X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-4716520a8f7c49b5abbe569ddffd2b542024-12-22T12:39:10ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2024-12-0119111210.1186/s13014-024-02571-xImpact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical TomotherapyJintao Ma0Shaonan Fan1Wenhan Huang2Xiaohong Xu3Yong Hu4Jian He5Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityAbstract Purpose This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods From January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent SBRT. They were categorized into two groups based on the presence of GGO-component: 65 patients in the subsolid group with a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 1 and 174 patients in the solid group with a CTR of 1. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression models for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed for adjusting confounding factors. Recurrence incidence was assessed using competing risk analysis and compared using Gray’s test. Results In the multivariate analysis, female, peripheral location, and subsolid nodules were favorable prognostic factors for LCSS; peripheral location, subsolid nodules, and adjuvant therapy were favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Between the subsolid (n = 65) and solid groups (n = 174), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.003), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.7% versus 80.3%, 90.9% versus 64.1%, 82.7% versus 53.5%, respectively. The median PFS were 72.5 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.030), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 75.4% versus 61.2%, 56.6% versus 44.9%, 48.6% versus 23.3%, respectively. After stabilized IPTW (n = 240), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.024), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.0% versus 82.4%, 92.2% versus 67.7%, 85.3% versus 58.2%, respectively. The median PFS were 60.2 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.096), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 73.8% versus 61.0%, 53.5% versus 46.2%, 46.8% versus 22.4%, respectively. The subsolid group had lower rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) (10.4% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.035) and distant metastasis (DM) (17.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.064) compared to the solid group. Conclusions The presence of GGO-component in the lesion is an independent prognostic factor for LCSS and PFS. Subsolid nodules treated with SBRT demonstrated better prognosis, with significantly lower rates of local-regional recurrence. We should highlight GGO-component as a practical indicator for risk stratification of SBRT patients to guide treatment decisions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02571-xEarly-stage lung cancerStereotactic body radiation therapyGGO-componentPrognosis
spellingShingle Jintao Ma
Shaonan Fan
Wenhan Huang
Xiaohong Xu
Yong Hu
Jian He
Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
Radiation Oncology
Early-stage lung cancer
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
GGO-component
Prognosis
title Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
title_full Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
title_fullStr Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
title_short Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
title_sort impact of ground glass component on prognosis in early stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via helical tomotherapy
topic Early-stage lung cancer
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
GGO-component
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02571-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jintaoma impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy
AT shaonanfan impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy
AT wenhanhuang impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy
AT xiaohongxu impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy
AT yonghu impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy
AT jianhe impactofgroundglasscomponentonprognosisinearlystagelungcancertreatedwithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyviahelicaltomotherapy