A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy

ABSTRACT Objective Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao Li, Zhiguo Ding, Bin Wei, Zhihao Ma, Jing Xie, Yonghao Tian, Lianlei Wang, Xinyu Liu, Suomao Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14260
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527092013957120
author Hao Li
Zhiguo Ding
Bin Wei
Zhihao Ma
Jing Xie
Yonghao Tian
Lianlei Wang
Xinyu Liu
Suomao Yuan
author_facet Hao Li
Zhiguo Ding
Bin Wei
Zhihao Ma
Jing Xie
Yonghao Tian
Lianlei Wang
Xinyu Liu
Suomao Yuan
author_sort Hao Li
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique‐trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes. Method A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty‐one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent‐sample t test and paired t‐test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann–Whitney U test were used for categorical data. Results The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the fluoroscopy frequency in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). In both TDA group and PPSF group, postoperative back and leg pain and the JOA score were significantly improved (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the pre‐ and postoperative VAS score for back and leg pain and the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, intervertebral fusion rate, and complications rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate.
format Article
id doaj-art-46757a03ed1f42b79136bb8547481b16
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-46757a03ed1f42b79136bb8547481b162025-01-16T05:31:15ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612025-01-01171829310.1111/os.14260A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical EfficacyHao Li0Zhiguo Ding1Bin Wei2Zhihao Ma3Jing Xie4Yonghao Tian5Lianlei Wang6Xinyu Liu7Suomao Yuan8Department of Orthopedics Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaShandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University Jinan ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Dermatology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shanxi People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Orthopedics Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan Shandong People's Republic of ChinaABSTRACT Objective Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique‐trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes. Method A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty‐one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent‐sample t test and paired t‐test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann–Whitney U test were used for categorical data. Results The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the fluoroscopy frequency in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). In both TDA group and PPSF group, postoperative back and leg pain and the JOA score were significantly improved (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the pre‐ and postoperative VAS score for back and leg pain and the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, intervertebral fusion rate, and complications rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14260facet joint violationlumbarminimally invasivepercutaneous pedicle screw fixationradiation exposure
spellingShingle Hao Li
Zhiguo Ding
Bin Wei
Zhihao Ma
Jing Xie
Yonghao Tian
Lianlei Wang
Xinyu Liu
Suomao Yuan
A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
Orthopaedic Surgery
facet joint violation
lumbar
minimally invasive
percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
radiation exposure
title A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
title_full A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
title_fullStr A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
title_short A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy
title_sort more efficient and safer improved percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique trajectory dynamic adjustment technique technical note and clinical efficacy
topic facet joint violation
lumbar
minimally invasive
percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
radiation exposure
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14260
work_keys_str_mv AT haoli amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT zhiguoding amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT binwei amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT zhihaoma amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT jingxie amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT yonghaotian amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT lianleiwang amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT xinyuliu amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT suomaoyuan amoreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT haoli moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT zhiguoding moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT binwei moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT zhihaoma moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT jingxie moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT yonghaotian moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT lianleiwang moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT xinyuliu moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy
AT suomaoyuan moreefficientandsaferimprovedpercutaneouspediclescrewinsertiontechniquetrajectorydynamicadjustmenttechniquetechnicalnoteandclinicalefficacy