Comparison of risk-of-bias assessment approaches for selection of studies reporting prevalence for economic analyses
Objectives Within cost-effectiveness models, prevalence figures can inform transition probabilities. The methodological quality of studies can inform the choice of prevalence figures but no single obvious candidate tool exists for assessing quality of the observational epidemiological studies for se...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jane E Harding, Richard Edlin, Matthew J Glasgow |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037324.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Prevalence of rare anatomic variants - publication bias due to selective reporting in meta-analyses studies
by: Vasileios Papadopoulos, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
by: Julian P T Higgins, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Assessment of Racial Bias within the Risk Analysis Index of Frailty
by: Michael A. Jacobs, MS, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Language models for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in complementary medicine
by: Honghao Lai, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Do delayed responses introduce bias in ecological momentary assessment? Evidence from comparisons between self-reported and objective physical activity
by: Stefan Schneider, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)